On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I'm trying to understand Colin Watson's discussion
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2003/debian-release-200309/msg00057.html
> of problems blocking python2.3 from testing (I found it thanks to
> DWN).
>
> I'm puzzled because mo
I wonder which is the Security Policy of Debian/testing. I know there is
a Security Team that looks after the stable distro, making patched
packets available ASAP. I am also aware that the unstable distro relies
on the goodwillness of Packet Maintainers, and that has often proved to
be as fast
Furjo wrote:
> For example, I still
> doesn't see a patched OpenSSH version in testing, whereas both stable
> and unstable have it!
OK, sorry, I didn't notice that the patched version has eventually
arrived... But the general question still remains!
Furjo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:30:56PM +0200, Furjo wrote:
> I wonder which is the Security Policy of Debian/testing.
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
If you're running testing on an exposed system then you need to keep a
very close eye on updates in unstable and install them manually whe
Furjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> proved to be as fast as the "stable" update. But what about testing? I
> feel that the patched packets go through the normal (slow!) procedure
> of being included only after 10 days they are in unstable plus all
> other criteria, and that seems to delay urgent p
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > The report from
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=python2.3 looks much
> > different, and I guess I was expecting Colin's note to be similar.
>
> It's a common mistake to assume that update_exc
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:40:03PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > The report from
> > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=python2.3 looks much
> > > different, and I guess I was expecting Colin's
Colin Watson wrote:
> python2.3 isn't ready for testing today because it just had a new
> version uploaded.
>
> python2.3 (2.2.106-2beta2 to 2.3.1-3)
> Maintainer: Matthias Klose
> Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
> idle-python2.3/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: python2.3-tk (>= 2.3.1-3)
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Asbj?rn S?b? wrote:
>
> After upgrading my Sarge installation yesterday, I got font problems.
> As far as I remember, the procedure used was to run "apt-get update",
> followed by aptitude.
>
> After the next reboot, Emacs came up showing only empty re
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:36:30PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > python2.3 isn't ready for testing today because it just had a new
> > version uploaded.
> >
> > python2.3 (2.2.106-2beta2 to 2.3.1-3)
> > Maintainer: Matthias Klose
> > Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
Atención: Este mensaje
contenía anexos que han sido eliminados (patch5155.exe).
Por favor, lea el(los) anexo(s) "VirusWarning.txt" para
más información.
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
MS User
this is the latest
Hello all,
i'm always use mp3blaster to read my music file.
But there are few month that i have a dependance break problem :
sudo apt-get install mp3blaster
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
reque
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:25:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>mp3blaster: Depends: libvorbis0a (>= 1.0.0) but it is not going to be
>installed
>E: Broken packages
>
> I wait but i see nothing.
>
> Is anyone can inform
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:25:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> i'm always use mp3blaster to read my music file.
>
> But there are few month that i have a dependance break problem :
[...]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>mp3blaster: Depends: libvorbis
I should really learn to press the right keys. :-(
For the archive, maybe someone finds it a bit helpful.
(Sorry Jean, if you get this twice.)
Mike
- Forwarded message from Mike Dornberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:42:29 +0200
> From: Mike Dornberger <[EMAIL PROT
I wonder which is the Security Policy of Debian/testing. I know there is
a Security Team that looks after the stable distro, making patched
packets available ASAP. I am also aware that the unstable distro relies
on the goodwillness of Packet Maintainers, and that has often proved to
be as fast
Furjo wrote:
> For example, I still
> doesn't see a patched OpenSSH version in testing, whereas both stable
> and unstable have it!
OK, sorry, I didn't notice that the patched version has eventually
arrived... But the general question still remains!
Furjo
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:30:56PM +0200, Furjo wrote:
> I wonder which is the Security Policy of Debian/testing.
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
If you're running testing on an exposed system then you need to keep a
very close eye on updates in unstable and install them manually whe
Furjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> proved to be as fast as the "stable" update. But what about testing? I
> feel that the patched packets go through the normal (slow!) procedure
> of being included only after 10 days they are in unstable plus all
> other criteria, and that seems to delay urgent p
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > The report from
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=python2.3 looks much
> > different, and I guess I was expecting Colin's note to be similar.
>
> It's a common mistake to assume that update_exc
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:40:03PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > The report from
> > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=python2.3 looks much
> > > different, and I guess I was expecting Colin's
Colin Watson wrote:
> python2.3 isn't ready for testing today because it just had a new
> version uploaded.
>
> python2.3 (2.2.106-2beta2 to 2.3.1-3)
> Maintainer: Matthias Klose
> Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
> idle-python2.3/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: python2.3-tk (>= 2.3.1-3)
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Asbj?rn S?b? wrote:
>
> After upgrading my Sarge installation yesterday, I got font problems.
> As far as I remember, the procedure used was to run "apt-get update",
> followed by aptitude.
>
> After the next reboot, Emacs came up showing only empty re
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:36:30PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > python2.3 isn't ready for testing today because it just had a new
> > version uploaded.
> >
> > python2.3 (2.2.106-2beta2 to 2.3.1-3)
> > Maintainer: Matthias Klose
> > Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
Atención: Este mensaje
contenía anexos que han sido eliminados (patch5155.exe).
Por favor, lea el(los) anexo(s) "VirusWarning.txt" para
más información.
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
MS User
this is the latest
Hello all,
i'm always use mp3blaster to read my music file.
But there are few month that i have a dependance break problem :
sudo apt-get install mp3blaster
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
reque
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:25:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>mp3blaster: Depends: libvorbis0a (>= 1.0.0) but it is not going to be
>installed
>E: Broken packages
>
> I wait but i see nothing.
>
> Is anyone can inform
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:25:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> i'm always use mp3blaster to read my music file.
>
> But there are few month that i have a dependance break problem :
[...]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>mp3blaster: Depends: libvorbis
I should really learn to press the right keys. :-(
For the archive, maybe someone finds it a bit helpful.
(Sorry Jean, if you get this twice.)
Mike
- Forwarded message from Mike Dornberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:42:29 +0200
> From: Mike Dornberger <[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I'm trying to understand Colin Watson's discussion
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2003/debian-release-200309/msg00057.html
> of problems blocking python2.3 from testing (I found it thanks to
> DWN).
>
> I'm puzzled because mo
30 matches
Mail list logo
