On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:40:03PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > The report from
> > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=python2.3 looks much
> > > different, and I guess I was expecting Colin's note to be similar.
> >
> > It's a common mistake to assume that update_excuses.html (which Bj?rn's
> > script uses, I believe) is the only relevant information. In fact
> > update_excuses.html only lists obvious and cheap-to-calculate problems.
> > More expensive checks - counting uninstallable packages after attempting
> > to install each package in turn - are logged in update_output.txt.
>
> Actually, my script already reads both these files.
Oh, OK, sorry.
> But there is currently no "trying: python2.3" line at all in
> update_output.txt, and hence no result to report. Could this be due to
> the following output at the bottom:
>
> Hint from ajt: python2.3/2.3.1-1
> Version mismatch, python2.3 2.3.1-1 != 2.3.1-2
> Not using hint
>
> Or is there some other reason for this, that perhaps my script could
> detect and report?
python2.3 isn't ready for testing today because it just had a new
version uploaded.
python2.3 (2.2.106-2beta2 to 2.3.1-3)
Maintainer: Matthias Klose
Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
idle-python2.3/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: python2.3-tk (>= 2.3.1-3)
python2.3-examples/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: python2.3 (>= 2.3.1-3)
Not considered
When you see "Not considered", that means that the package does not go
through the (expensive) stage of processing that produces
update_output.txt.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
