Furjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > proved to be as fast as the "stable" update. But what about testing? I > feel that the patched packets go through the normal (slow!) procedure > of being included only after 10 days they are in unstable plus all > other criteria, and that seems to delay urgent patches!
In practice security updates to stable goes through the standard procedure. If package maintainers sets the urgency of a version to high the 10 days it is held in unstable is shortened to 2 days but all the other criterias still apply. It is posible to upload to testing-proposed-updates but not mainy developers do so. -- Peter Makholm | One thing you do is prevent good software from [EMAIL PROTECTED] | being written. Who can afford to do professional http://hacking.dk | work for nothing? | -- Bill Gates
