Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread pmjorge
- Message from da...@debian.org - Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:05:58 -0700 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: >> This mistake made it onto

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Rushing
OK - thanks guys... :) On 05/10/2012 09:05 AM, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: This mistake made it onto a few machines here befor

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: > > > On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: > >> This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and > >> came to check... it's an okay update

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Pedro Mendes Jorge
On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: >> This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and >> came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the >> meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untest

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: > This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and > came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the > meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested > work-in-progress that slipped in... that I sh

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, May 10, 2012 12:39, Mark Rushing wrote: > This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and came > to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the meantime > though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested work-in-progress that > slipped in... that I should revert fr

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Rushing
This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested work-in-progress that slipped in... that I should revert from ? Thanks, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2012 09:45, Benjamin Vetter wrote: > my apt wants to update linux-image-2.6 ? (amd64) > > the last-modified stamp of the .deb on the mirrors is 06-May, so quite a > few days have already passed > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ &

linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Benjamin Vetter
Hi, my apt wants to update linux-image-2.6 ? (amd64) the last-modified stamp of the .deb on the mirrors is 06-May, so quite a few days have already passed http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ i don't see any advisory and i guess it's not the PT which is alrea