OK - thanks guys... :)
On 05/10/2012 09:05 AM, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote:
On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote:
This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and
came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the
meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested
work-in-progress that slipped in... that I should revert from.... ?
Yes, it is very much OK to install. In fact, it is identical to what
will be in the point release, except that it lacks a build fix for
some non-x86 architectures.
Hi Dan,
What do you mean by "some non-x86 architectures"?
Sould I revert on amd64?
Sorry for being unclear.
*Any* 2.6.32-34 kernel you installed from security.debian.org is
OK. There are some architectures on which it did not build - and those
will not be available until 2.6.32-45 which will be in the point
release this weekend. But all builds for all architectures that did
build (i386, amd64 and sparc) are fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fabf153.40...@orbislumen.net
