On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: > > > On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: > >> This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and > >> came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the > >> meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested > >> work-in-progress that slipped in... that I should revert from.... ? > > > > Yes, it is very much OK to install. In fact, it is identical to what > > will be in the point release, except that it lacks a build fix for > > some non-x86 architectures. > > > > Hi Dan, > > What do you mean by "some non-x86 architectures"? > Sould I revert on amd64?
Sorry for being unclear. *Any* 2.6.32-34 kernel you installed from security.debian.org is OK. There are some architectures on which it did not build - and those will not be available until 2.6.32-45 which will be in the point release this weekend. But all builds for all architectures that did build (i386, amd64 and sparc) are fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120510160558.gb4...@dannf.org
