max wrote on 20/01/2022 at 22:51:24+0100:
> January 18, 2022 11:28:48 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue"
> wrote:
>
>> if you keep being pushy, ask that you are temporarily prevented to
>> mail debian lists
>
> You didn't actually reply to my question addressed to you.
That's true. The reason is
I
On 1/20/22 13:51, max wrote:
January 18, 2022 11:28:48 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" wrote:
if you keep being pushy, ask that you are temporarily prevented to mail debian
lists
You didn't actually reply to my question addressed to you. All you did was
publicly threaten me (and thus anyon
January 18, 2022 11:28:48 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" wrote:
> if you keep being pushy, ask that you are temporarily prevented to mail
> debian lists
You didn't actually reply to my question addressed to you. All you did was
publicly threaten me (and thus anyone else who might be interested
max wrote on 18/01/2022 at 05:46:10+0100:
> January 14, 2022 11:44:39 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue"
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that
>> matter?
>
> I thought this was just an oversight, but since this is intentional,
> it isn't. How can you poss
January 14, 2022 11:44:39 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" wrote:
> Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that
matter?
I thought this was just an oversight, but since this is intentional, it isn't.
How can you possibly justify and continue such a flagrant misrepresentation
https://chng.it/jJvMChbdsJ
сб, 15 янв. 2022 г., 01:45 Pierre-Elliott Bécue :
>
> max wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100:
>
> > January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
> >
> >> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity,
> for context see #9921
max wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100:
> January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>
>> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity, for
>> context see #992115.
>
> As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD
> ratings, b
January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity, for
> context see #992115.
As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD ratings, but
it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings,
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:20:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > (Side note: It seems that NVD tends to assign "medium" severity to
> > vulnerabilities initially, but upgrades them to "high" or "critical"
> > later. However, Debian keeps showing the initial severity rating)
>
> Please send a pa
(Added: CC: secur...@debian.org as requested. Please see the mailing list
archive if you need context)
January 5, 2022 7:20:46 AM CET Paul Wise wrote:
> This isn't entirely factual either.
How about this (added "largely"):
"""
Debian's security updates are largely created by volunteers work
On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 11:04 -0500, Silas Cutler wrote:
> I'd also like to see information on both how to submit
> vulnerabilities as well as how to contribute to getting them fixed.
These are addressed in the FAQ:
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#discover
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#h
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 19:46 +0100, max wrote:
> Debian's security updates are created by volunteers working in their
> spare time. Some packages may receive more attention than others. To
> view the current list of known unfixed vulnerabilities see
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/sta
Hi Max -
(First time poster (?Maybe) / long time lurker).
I think highlighting that Debian is supported by volunteers is important
and providing up front a link to tracker is outstanding. The "we take
security seriously" text is dated consistent with standard boiler-plate
text.
I'd also li
13 matches
Mail list logo
