https://chng.it/jJvMChbdsJ

сб, 15 янв. 2022 г., 01:45 Pierre-Elliott Bécue <p...@debian.org>:

>
> max  <maxwi...@mailfence.com> wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100:
>
> > January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity,
> for context see #992115.
> >
> > As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD
> > ratings, but it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings,
> > when they are actually much worse, as it's been doing. In fact, I
> > think it should issue a public retraction.
> >
> > Any progress on my original proposal? Are the wheels in motion?
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2021/12/msg00002.html
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2022/01/msg00002.html
> >
> > I can't help but feel that it's a 15 second job for anyone with write
> > access to the site, and the reprehensibility of the current claims
> > should be obvious to those with a working moral compass.
>
> Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that
> matter?
>
> Regards,
> --
> PEB
>
>

Reply via email to