max <maxwi...@mailfence.com> wrote on 20/01/2022 at 22:51:24+0100: > January 18, 2022 11:28:48 PM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <p...@debian.org> > wrote: > >> if you keep being pushy, ask that you are temporarily prevented to >> mail debian lists > > You didn't actually reply to my question addressed to you.
That's true. The reason is that I have no intent to reply to your question addressed to me. Essentially because of your behaviour, but also because I am not part of the Security Team. > All you did was publicly threaten me […] with a ban. I also told you that your actions could be perceived as aggressive (and the more things go on, the more I'm convinced that it could be more than a subjective feeling), but it seems you decided to ignore that point. > (and thus anyone else who might be interested in discussing this > issue) Where I live, we usually call this kind of reasoning a sophism. I don't think that I need to elaborate on this. > That's some shameful stuff. Thanks for sharing your opinion on this. In order to spare both of us some time, let's agree to disagree. > And yes, if it looks like I stopped posting, it means that I was banned. If that were to happen, then it would mean a listmaster read what you said and considered your behaviour was against the Debian Lists Policy/Code of Conduct/Standard (call it whatever you like), and therefore it would be quite normal. Instead of grinding some axe for an unknown reason, and being semi spamming about that topic (which is quite unimportant, to be fair) for the last month, feel free to contribute, or, if you don't want to, then go do something else. Apart from being annoying, you are achieving nothing here, and we all have better things to do. Regards, -- Pierre-Elliott Bécue
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
