Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread pmjorge
- Message from da...@debian.org - Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:05:58 -0700 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: >> This mistake made it onto

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Rushing
OK - thanks guys... :) On 05/10/2012 09:05 AM, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: This mistake made it onto a few machines here befor

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Pedro Mendes Jorge wrote: > > > On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: > >> This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and > >> came to check... it's an okay update

Message de Benjamin MABILLE / CCA

2012-05-10 Thread Mabille Benjamin
Bonjour, J'ai bien recu votre message, je suis actuellement en conges et je serai de retour le Mardi 15 mai 2012. En mon absence, vous pouvez contacter notre standard au 0826 80 80 80 ou le service technique a l'adresse techni...@intracall.com Cordialement, CCA International Benjamin MABILLE

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Pedro Mendes Jorge
On 05/10/2012 02:47 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: >> This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and >> came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the >> meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untest

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:58AM -0700, Mark Rushing wrote: > This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and > came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the > meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested > work-in-progress that slipped in... that I sh

Re: Message de Benjamin MABILLE / CCA

2012-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2012-05-09 19:03, AK wrote: Dear debian-security ML, I thing that the situation with Out-Of-Office replies is getting a bit out of hand. Can someone please temporarily unsubscribe the offending parties? It does not reflect to the quality of the list. If the moderators are too busy with othe

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, May 10, 2012 12:39, Mark Rushing wrote: > This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and came > to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the meantime > though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested work-in-progress that > slipped in... that I should revert fr

Re: Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Rushing
This mistake made it onto a few machines here before I noticed and came to check... it's an okay update to have installed, in the meantime though, yes? I mean, it's not some untested work-in-progress that slipped in... that I should revert from ? Thanks, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2012 09:45, Benjamin Vetter wrote: > my apt wants to update linux-image-2.6 ? (amd64) > > the last-modified stamp of the .deb on the mirrors is 06-May, so quite a > few days have already passed > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ > > i don't see any advis

linux-image-2.6

2012-05-10 Thread Benjamin Vetter
Hi, my apt wants to update linux-image-2.6 ? (amd64) the last-modified stamp of the .deb on the mirrors is 06-May, so quite a few days have already passed http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ i don't see any advisory and i guess it's not the PT which is already pushed...