Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 10:38 +0900 schrieb d...@debian.org: [..] > I am unable to join Ruby Sprint in Paris, but I suggest adding the following > packages to RM: Thanks. I added them to the list. ruby-terrapin, ruby-bourne and ruby-mail-room were just removed from Testing. If they are not n

Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

Hi Team, On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > - a dozen packages are RM candidates in my opinion and should be discussed in > Paris I am unable to join Ruby Sprint in Paris, but I suggest adding the following packages to RM: * berkshelf related packages (upstream arc

Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

Hi, a current status update: Am Samstag, dem 21.01.2023 um 20:25 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert: [..] > look for "testing migrations": > https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&email2=&email3=&packages=&ignpackages=&format=html&onlysidnottesting=on

Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

Am Samstag, dem 21.01.2023 um 10:17 +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > ... > > But there are other packages that would require pre-work as > > well: > > > > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&version=testing > > > > Maybe someone knows a w

Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

... But there are other packages that would require pre-work as well: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&version=testing Maybe someone knows a way to extract the list of packages not in Testing, but in Unstable? In the past, release