Please allow bacula_2.4.3-1 for lenny.

Hello! Release 2.4.3 is a bug fix to version 2.4.2. For the list of fixed bugs and complete changelog please view [1]. Also, the debian package includes the "2.4.3-orphaned-jobs.patch" which fixes an important bug [2]. Thanks [1] http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=632260&

Re: [Fwd: Bug#509184: bacula-director-pgsql: Director crashes with double free from jcr.c:343]

[CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org, mip...@buildd.debian.org] On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:45 AM, John Goerzen wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: >> John Goerzen wrote: >>> Would you approve an upload to testing-proposed-updates into lenny with >>> such a patch if I built it? >> >> Would unblocking the versi

[Fwd: Bug#509184: bacula-director-pgsql: Director crashes with double free from jcr.c:343]

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> I can confirm that the package builds fine, started a build yesterday >> on a mipsel box I have access to. I did build it in an uptodate unstable >> cowbuilder chroot, the build log can be found here: >>

Please allow gnome-commander v1.2.3-1 get in for etch

I've head some problems with the current version of gnome-commander (1.2.0-3) from etch that seams to be fixed with the current version from unstable. Checking gnome-commander * trying to update gnome-commander from 1.2.0-3.2 to 1.2.3-1 (candidate is 76 days old) * gnome-commander is in fr

Re: Please allow gnome-commander v1.2.3-1 get in for etch

On 2/27/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Teodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've head some problems with the current version of gnome-commander > (1.2.0-3) from etch that seams to be fixed with the current version > from unstable. The

mail-notification: depends on libeel2-2 package that was removed from etch

The mail-notification package depends on libeel2-2 (>= 2.14.0) but the package is not available. Because of this the package can not be installed from a missing dependency. The dependency problem was changed in the version from unstable: libeel2-2 (>= 2.12.0) [hurd-i386] Package not availabl

Possible missing sync on the repositories

Good news that Debian 4.0r0 is out. One small thing to mention is that an update with Synaptic gives this warning: W: Conflicting distribution: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release (expected stable but got sarge) W: Conflicting distribution: http://ftp.ro.debian.org stable-proposed-

bindgraph/0.2a-2 for etch r1?

Hi, Can you accept `bindgraph' version 0.2a-2 into etch? This was supposed to transition from December, 2006 but it was not in our attention until after the final freeze. The most important reasons: * the current version in etch is not working, so it might be considered as a RC bug; * the versio

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On 5/20/07, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 00:11:44 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > > An up-to-date version is at . > > This yields a

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 Non-US

On 5/22/07, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Tapio Laihinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070513 21:34]: > When the Non-US version of the "etch" is coming? The non-us-branch of Debian has already been discontinued with the release of sarge. In this case it should be removed from the manuals a

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 Non-US

On 5/23/07, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:28:06PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > In this case it should be removed from the manuals and the web pages: > > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages I'm removing it from that page now, thanks for the n

package 'vncserver' should be removed from amd64

The 'vncserver' package is not working and FTBFS on amd64 architecture: #276948 . Because of this I propose to be removed from unstable (and automatically from lenny). Maybe the 'vnc' source package should be removed along with all the binary

'libcdio6' removed from unstable --> broken dependents

The following packages cannot be installed on 'unstable' because are depending on 'libcdio6' package which was removed from the archive: xmms2-plugin-cdda vlc-nox vlc mednafen libdevice-cdio-perl gstreamer-0.10-plugins-good fuseiso9660 I'm recently moved to 'unstable' so please let me know where

Re: 'libcdio6' removed from unstable --> broken dependents

On 10/22/07, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you'd like to use unstable, I recommend you put unstable *and* > testing in your sources.list. Life will be easier. I'll take this advice, thanks.

'vlc_0.8.6.c-3+b1' package is broken (unmet dependencies)

The 'vlc' package is uninstalable because it has some unmet dependencies (packages removed from unstable). Probably a rebuild or a dependency change is needed. Thanks inspire:~# apt-get install vlc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Som

give back (on alpha only) and unblock jfsutils

, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Teodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The build for jfsutils_1.1.12-1 has failed only on alpha [1]. Can you > tell if this an issue with the build environment on alpha [2] or a bug > in the jfsutils package? > > > [1] http://buildd.debian.org/pkg

Bug#702547: unblock: unattended-upgrades/0.79.5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package unattended-upgrades. It contains one important fix: * unattended-upgrade: - do not nice/ionice as this wil affect daemon restarts (closes: #701850) Th

Bug#601851: unblock: pptpd/1.3.4-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pptpd. After an upgrade from Debian 5.0 to 6.0 it stopped working due to 'logwtmp' option being broken. This was fixed already and the new package is 34 days old with

Bug#602381: unblock: qemu-kvm/0.12.5+dfsg-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package qemu-kvm. It fixes one grave bug. qemu-kvm (0.12.5+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Michael Tokarev ] * QEMUFileBuffered:-indicate-that-were-ready-when-the-

Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0 (squeeze). Thanks unblock mercurial-server

Bug#608993: unblock: unscd/0.47-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package unscd. It fixes RC bug #606588 although it's not listed on UDD [1] for some reason. Thanks unscd (0.47-2) unstable; urgency=low * Remove the Provides: nscd as a

Dead links on /etc/rc?.d/ after a clean install of 'etch-RC1'

Hi, I've just made a new installation of Debian using latest the CD image for 'net install' (RC1). The installation was completed successfully. This message is here to inform you that there are dead links in the run levels 2 and 3 as it can be seen below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /etc/rc?.d/*

please hint grub 0.97-20 for etch

On the excuses page I see that it is only 4 of 10 days old. Please consider upgrade to 0.97-20 as it solves the bug #401865 against linux-image-2.6.18-3-686. There are minor changes between 19 and 20 builds: grub (0.97-20) unstable; urgency=low * Add manpage for grub-set-default. Thanks for

Re: Please unblock couriergraph 0.25-1.1

Please also correct the PATH for the couriergraph.cgi script. As it is already reported on the bug #369839 the correct path is /usr/lib/cgi-bin instead of /usr/lib/cgi-lib. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L couriergraph /. /usr /usr/sbin /usr/sbin/couriergraph.pl /usr/lib /usr/lib/cgi-bin /usr/lib/cgi

Re: Bug#369839: Please unblock couriergraph 0.25-1.1

On 1/17/07, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Teodor wrote: > > Please also correct the PATH for the couriergraph.cgi script. As it is > > already reported on the bug #369839 the correct path is > > /usr/lib/

Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: opu Hi, This is a follow up on one email thread from list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00182.html Please apply the attached patch to php-mdb2 package version 2.5.0b2-1 fro

Re: chromium not in Squeeze: a bit of communication needed?

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-09-08 16:10 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> I think that this need is justification to declare backports "officially >> supported by the debian project".  Thus when asked this question, you >> can point to the fact that chromium is ind

Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1

2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy : > On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote: >> >> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this >> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0 >> (squeeze). >> > > I think it's too late to

Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1

2011/1/24 Neil McGovern : > By the looks of things, Mehdi has already replied to your bug saying > that we can't accept the package at this stage. Yes, I know. But I thought that it could also be a good candidate for a "second thought" as it has been for other packages too. I mean, the package is

Re: Volatile Going Away?

Hi, 2011/1/27 Philipp Kern : > possibly.  The only value I see in this is the transparent "we upgrade to the > next stable version when it's released" way of upgrading.[1]  Apart from that > we're not entirely unhappy with only using codenames instead of suite > aliases. Of course, I only use cod

Re: New clamav upstream version: Should it go into squeeze?

Hi, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:18:47 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >> Since the planned way to keep clamav updated in Squeeze will be by >> updating to the latest current clamav stable release, the same should >> naturally apply during

Re: Please create volatile indices for squeeze

[added debian-live as requested by Daniel] Hi, 2010/11/13 Philipp Kern : > Please wait until this is formally communicated.  The name might as well > still change.  (Or the contents of the Release file, for pinning etc.) > > (I.e. the uncoordinated export from ftp-master wasn't our "wish".) Of c

Bug#604855: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.3.1+dfsg-3

Hi, 2010/11/25 Russ Allbery : > Ah, hm, that's a good point.  I hadn't thought about that, since the old > Shibboleth modules depended on Apache.  But the current packages only > recommend. > > I'm not sure the best way to do this.  Check for whether apache2.2-common > is installed, since it conta

Bug#606651: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.16-1

Hi, Just a note, iceweasel's migration is blocked by sqlite3 [1]. I've seen this today on my systems where the packages where kept back on a dist-upgrade (manually added a PIN for the version in unstable until the release). So, this probably means an unblock for sqlite3 or a t-p-u upload. This sho

Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1

Hi, 2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy : > > I think it's too late to get it back in Squeeze. What would be the risk of including this package with no release critical bugs into 6.0? There are packages with RC bugs that are ignored and still allowed to be released with 6.0, but a package with no RC bugs is no

Bug#663541: error: alternative path /usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.7.jar doesn't exist

Hi Debian Release team, The reported problem here appears to be for amd64 only because I was able to install the package libswt-gtk-3-java on i386. Also, looking at the build status page [1] I see that the amd64 package was uploaded directly by the maintainer. Is there any chance that scheduling

Re: php-mdb2: fix for bug#571702 in squeeze?

2012/5/8 Thomas Goirand : > Yes. As I wrote, this was fixed upstream, and the diff is only a > backport of upstream fix for the issue which I believe Teodor did (I'm > not sure who's the author, but it looked correct to me). I'm the author of the patch. I tried to find how

Re: php-mdb2: fix for bug#571702 in squeeze?

2012/5/8 Cyril Brulebois : > As far as I'm concerned, I can't judge the impact of that PHP thingy. > [..] > So, unless somebody feels fancy and wants to take it from here, that's > a “no” for me. I don't think this decision should be based on feelings, but rather on technical analyse of the patch.

Re: php-mdb2: fix for bug#571702 in squeeze?

2012/5/8 Adam D. Barratt : > I'll add looking at this to my to-do list. > > In any case, the window for getting fixes into the upcoming point release > closed a couple of days ago, so the package won't get approved (or > otherwise) until the point release has happened (scheduled for the coming > we

Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1

Hi, 2014/1/21 intrigeri : > Hi, > > Teodor, ping? I don't have the necessary experience to make this source debdiff. Thomas, are you still interested in uploading this (simple) patch for squeeze? Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Re: 2.6.19, kernel-package problems and what are our plans for etch ...

so > long to release Etch anymore. Bah, we where told this for sarge, and it took over a year back then. I don't see us releaseing etch anytime soon, since we don't have had a single release candidate of d-i with the 2.6.18 kernels in it yet, so moving 2.6.19 to unstable (maybe wit