[added debian-live as requested by Daniel] Hi,
2010/11/13 Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org>: > Please wait until this is formally communicated. The name might as well > still change. (Or the contents of the Release file, for pinning etc.) > > (I.e. the uncoordinated export from ftp-master wasn't our "wish".) Of course we'll wait until Debian 6.0 is released anyway (there are no packages yet in volatile or backports). However, I don't see why having squeeze-volatile on the master debian/ repository (and thus on all mirrors) is an issue?! IMO this is a step forward and backports will probably follow for wheezy. Probably there wasn't enough man power to do it for squeeze, at least this is how I see the situation with backports -- which is exactly in the same situation as volatile archive was for lenny with the difference that the backports archive has less restrictions (also a good thing). The only issue that I can see with the current implementation regarding stable/security/volatile/backports is report on bug #602390 [1]. Thanks [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602390 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfwmnyrk8hdnvtenv6v5awy3p5j7cs531jg...@mail.gmail.com
