On 11/14/2016 10:38 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/11/16 21:54, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Please retry the osmium-tool builds that FTBFS with libosmium 2.10.0,
>> I've reverted libosmium back to 2.9.0 until upstream has fixed the IdSet
>> issues intro
On 11/29/2016 07:47 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> gb grass_7.0.5-2 . mips mipsel mips64el
grass in unstable is from before this issue,
the version is experimental is affected, so:
gb grass_7.2.0~rc2-1~exp1 . mips mipsel mips64el . experimental
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE8
On 12/03/2016 12:29 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/11/16 13:53, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
>> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
>> Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thu
Sorry for the outdated debdiff, for p-u the distribution has been
changed to stable.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
diff -Nru mapserver-6.4.1/debian/changelog mapserver-6.4.1/debian/changelog
--- mapserver
On 12/06/2016 10:00 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Sorry for the outdated debdiff, for p-u the distribution has been
> changed to stable.
With mapserver (7.0.3-1) having migrated to testing and the subsequent
update of the backport, CVE-2016-9839 is now fixed everywhere except in
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 12/17/2016 12:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:47:12 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2016 10:00 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Sorry for the outdated debdiff, for p-u the distribution has been
On 01/05/2017 09:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 22:00 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Sorry for the outdated debdiff, for p-u the distribution has been
>> changed to stable.
>
> Please go ahead.
Thanks!
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4
On 01/07/2017 09:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 23:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + pending
>>
>> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 21:27 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2017 09:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
On 01/07/2017 09:55 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 01/07/2017 09:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 23:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 + pending
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 21:27 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenber
On 01/07/2017 10:39 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 10:24 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 01/07/2017 09:55 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2017 09:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 23:23 +, Adam D
On 01/09/2017 11:33 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> nagios3 was removed from unstable, but for some reason is still in testing,
> please remove it from there as well.
It still has reverse dependencies in testing, specifically nagios2mantis
is listed in the britney output [0] which `dak rm -Rn -s t
On 01/18/2017 06:52 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/01/17 18:37, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package mapserver, it fixes CVE-2017-5522.
>
> I can't find
On 01/28/2017 11:27 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Bas Couwenberg:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock/age package libmodule-corelist-perl
>> to allow perl and mapserver to migrate to testing.
>>
>>
On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>>
>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released
On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> For the Debian GIS t
On 19-02-16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>&
On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>&
On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>&
On 03-03-16 20:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>&
On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-03-16 20:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 03-03-16 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>&
On 04-03-16 00:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/03/16 00:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be
>>> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry
What to do about the entanglement with the libvigraimpex transition
(#815153) through saga?
Should we get saga removed from testing to allow the rest of the
affected packages in the gdal transition to migrate?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056
On 07-03-16 21:36, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 22 January 2016 17:52:08 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 22-01-16 17:03, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> FWIW you also need Qt5's QWT. The packages are kind of ready in
>
On 04/18/2016 09:53 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, at 19:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 18/04/16 15:59, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>> Ping, the new json-c was just accepted to experimental.
>>
>> Go ahead.
>
> Uploaded, thanks. Also bumped the syslog-ng and rt-app bugs to serious
On 05/10/2016 04:07 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-2.1.0.html
>
> On 2016-05-10 14:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/05/16 19:12, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: rele
On 05/14/2016 11:30 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The vtk6 issue on mipsel remains. texlive-bin (2016.20160513.41080-1)
> fixed the FTBFS on most architectures, but still fails on mips, mipsel &
> sparc64. I've reported #824260 for this.
texlive-bin on mipsel has been fixed, and r-base is now also a
On 05/20/2016 11:27 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/14/2016 11:30 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> The vtk6 issue on mipsel remains. texlive-bin (2016.20160513.41080-1)
>> fixed the FTBFS on most architectures, but still fails on mips, mipsel &
>> sparc64. I
On 05/20/2016 11:27 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/14/2016 11:30 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> The vtk6 issue on mipsel remains. texlive-bin (2016.20160513.41080-1)
>> fixed the FTBFS on most architectures, but still fails on mips, mipsel &
>> sparc64. I
On 05/21/2016 11:19 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/05/16 16:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 05/20/2016 11:27 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2016 11:30 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> The vtk6 issue on mipsel remains. texlive-bin (201
On 05/22/2016 12:20 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/21/2016 11:19 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 20/05/16 16:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 05/20/2016 11:27 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 05/14/2016 11:30 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 05/27/2016 11:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 27/05/16 01:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 05/22/2016 12:20 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2016 11:19 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 20/05/16 16:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wr
On 05/27/2016 11:25 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 27/05/16 11:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 05/27/2016 11:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 27/05/16 01:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 05/22/2016 12:20 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wr
On 07/13/2016 04:18 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1.
>>
>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME
>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account f
It looks like #831336 that is preventing the rebuild of vtk6 will cause
some delay in the testing migration of the packages involved in this
transition.
This leaves testing users of the qmapshack package affected by the
critial issue reported in #831297. It's been fixed with the new upstream
relea
On 08/04/2016 07:59 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> webp 0.5.1 is now in unstable, will see if anything explodes
The mapnik binNMU FTBFS on armhf, and vlc FTBFS on mips* before the
libwebp NMUs.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1
Hi Adam,
On 08/07/2016 12:04 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 23:47 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Please binNMU python-mapnik & node-mapnik in experimental, they need to
>> be rebuild with libmapnik-dev (3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp2) which depends on
>> the correct libmapbox-variant-de
On 08/23/16 11:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated
transition.
Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build?
I'll test the affected packages maintained by the Debian GIS team and
upload them to unstable if t
On 08/23/16 11:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/23/16 11:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated
transition.
Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build?
I'll test the affected packages maintain
On 08/23/16 16:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
protobuf (3.0.0-1) FTBFS pretty much everywhere. :-(
Using -Werror may be a bit much based on the buildlogs.
I think it may not be the problem in this particular case...
I
On 08/23/16 12:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/23/16 11:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On s390x, alpha & sparc64 the build fails with:
./.libs/libprotobuf.so: undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*,
long)'
./.libs/libpr
On 08/24/16 13:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
For hurd-i386 a patch is needed to define PATH_MAX, and on kfreebsd-*
the builds fails with:
google/protobuf/stubs/stringpiece_unittest.cc: In member function
'virtual void
google::protobuf::{anonymous}::NonNegativeLenTest_NonNegativeLen
Control: block -1 by 809290 811917 822380
On 08/23/16 16:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build?
No... We will have to deal with fallout, if any... It is crucial
On 08/25/16 17:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Several packages unfortunately fail to build, some due to unrelated
issues to the new protobuf packages. Bugs still need to be filed for
those that weren't sid-ony due to RC bugs already.
The bugreports have been filed, and ones specif
On 08/25/16 19:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/25/16 17:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Several packages unfortunately fail to build, some due to unrelated
issues to the new protobuf packages. Bugs still need to be filed for
those that weren't sid-ony due to RC bugs already.
On 08/31/16 00:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 28/08/16 18:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/25/16 19:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/25/16 17:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Several packages unfortunately fail to build, some due to unrelated
issues to the new protobuf
On 08/31/16 11:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/31/16 00:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 28/08/16 18:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/25/16 19:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/25/16 17:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Several packages unfortunately fail to build, some
On 08/31/2016 04:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 31/08/16 12:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Just for the record, osmium rebuilds are failing because most tests segfault
>> by
>> having two versions of libdap installed. Caused by the uncoordinated
>> t
On 08/31/2016 12:31 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> As discussed in the protobuf transition bugreport, the upload of
> libdap (3.18.0-1) to unstable has triggered another uncoordinated
> transition, which is causing the osmium rebuilds to fail.
>
> Before the reverse dependencies can be rebuilt, the b
protobuf (3.0.0-7) has been uploaded to unstable which contains a patch
to fix the ostinato build failure (#).
Can you schedule a dep-wait to rebuild ostinato (0.8-1) with
libprotobuf-dev (3.0.0-7) once that's available on the buildds?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
F
On 09/03/2016 11:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/09/16 11:29, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> Control: forwarded -1
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-p
On 09/03/2016 12:14 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 11:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/09/16 11:29, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
On 09/04/2016 12:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/09/16 21:41, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> proj (4.9.3-1) has been uploaded to unstable, and has been built on all
>> release architectures. The ports need a little more time.
>
> binnmus scheduled.
Many
On 09/04/2016 05:32 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 12:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/09/16 21:41, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> proj (4.9.3-1) has been uploaded to unstable, and has been built on all
>>> release architectures. The po
On 09/05/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 05:32 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 09/04/2016 12:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 03/09/16 21:41, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> proj (4.9.3-1) has been uploaded to unsta
On 09/08/2016 12:00 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/09/16 10:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> It sadly seems to be the season of uncoordinated transitions, with some
>> maintainers not learning for their past mistakes. Very disappointing.
>
> It's already started, so let's tag it as such.
>
I've done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact of this transition.
The results are summarized below. Several package suffer from
uninstallable build dependencies by having libopenmpi1.10 pulled in by
dependencies that failed to rebuild.
fftw (2.1.5-4) FTBFS due to . being removed from @INC in
On 09/08/2016 01:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I've done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact of this transition.
> The results are summarized below. Several package suffer from
> uninstallable build dependencies by having libopenmpi1.10 pulled in by
> dependenci
On 09/09/2016 11:25 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 01:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I've done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact of this transition.
>> The results are summarized below. Several package suffer from
>> uninstallable bu
On 09/09/2016 05:24 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:19:39PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:05:25 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg > l.nl> wrote:
>> ...
>>>>
>>>> It looks like armadillo will require a transition
On 09/09/2016 06:14 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> I have erroneously uploaded armadillo to unstable to close #837152. I
> wish to apologize and get advice on whether I can do something to
> prevent further trouble.
The transition workflow is documented on the wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Rel
This transition is complicated by being intertwined with the openmpi
transition.
The getfem++ & petsc build dependencies cannot be installed until
scalapack is rebuilt with openmpi 2.0, unfortunately scalapack FTBFS due
to test failures (#837062) which need to be resolved first.
And the slepc bui
On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse
> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and
> will test it in the next couple of days.
Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unbloc
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Ivo,
On 04/22/2017 01:51 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:39:03PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> It "fixes" #860621 by ignoring test failure on i386 where it's normally
>> not built (the source only builds arch:all packages)
>
> Do you expect
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Ivo,
On 04/22/2017 01:58 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:40:33PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Please unblock package pysal
>>
>> It "fixes" #860694 by ignoring test failure on i386 where it's normally
>> not built (the source only builds arc
On 11/17/18 2:06 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 17/11/2018 à 11:54 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 15/11/2018 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags:
On 12/1/18 5:16 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:53:29 +0100 Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> On 2018-11-30 14:31, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 17/11/2018 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15/11/2018 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrot
On 1/2/19 12:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/12/2018 08:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.4.0.
>>
>> Like th
On 1/3/19 4:23 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/01/2019 21:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 1/2/19 12:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 26/12/2018 08:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
On 1/3/19 4:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/3/19 4:23 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 02/01/2019 21:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 1/2/19 12:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 26/12/2018 08:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
On 1/4/19 10:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/01/2019 17:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 1/3/19 4:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 1/3/19 4:23 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 02/01/2019 21:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
&g
On 2/14/19 7:01 PM, Martin Busch wrote:
> Something appears to be wrong. I have my system set up to use
> stretch-updates, I can see 'apt update' retrieving the package list for
> it, but 'apt search certbot' still returns 0.10.2 as the newest stable
> version. 0.28.0 and 0.31.0 appear as "testing"
On 06/25/2017 11:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-19):
>> +qgis (2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium
>
> Please target stretch if you want to update packages in stretch.
Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a
recognised distribution and t
On 06/26/2017 01:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-26):
>> I see no reason to not accept the stretch-pu.
>>
>> The issue with qgis and osgearth 2.8 / openscenegraph-3.4 only affects
>> unstable.
>
> As I said: version constraints. stable must have a lower version than
> the
On 07/01/2017 09:17 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.1.
>
> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.2 (#842288), there is no SONAME
> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol
> changes.
>
> All reverse dependen
On 07/03/2017 11:36 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Bas Couwenberg (2017-07-01):
>> protozero 1.5.1 in stretch contains a serious bug that was fixed in
>> 1.5.2. The fix has been cherry-picked and I'd like to upload this
>> proposed-update.
>>
>> >From the changelog and patch description:
>>
>> "
>>
On 07/08/2017 06:31 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> To fix the incompatibility between NRPE 2.x and 3.x releases when SSL
>> support is enabled, I'd like to propose the following update.
>
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
Kin
On 07/10/2017 05:45 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/07/17 21:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/07/17 21:17, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.1.
>>>
>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.2 (#842288), there is no SONAME
>>>
On 07/10/2017 08:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 05:45 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 04/07/17 21:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 01/07/17 21:17, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transitio
On 07/12/2017 07:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 11/07/17 18:39, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 07/10/2017 08:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 07/10/2017 05:45 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/17 21:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 08/27/2017 12:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 17:42 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Upstream has releases a new stable release of libosmium fixing important
>> bugs which I'd like to propose for inclusion in the next stable update.
>
> So far as
On 06/25/2017 01:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Now stretch is released we can deal with this.
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Transition should have minimal impact on these addons.
>> Most other pure Node.js modules should be okay - they either
>> are alread
On 09/09/2017 03:42 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 17:43:26 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> Upstream has released a new stable release of pyosmium fixing important
>> bugs which I'd like to propose for inclusion in the next stable update.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Bas
>
>>
On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.2.
>>
>> Like
On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
On 10/03/2017 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
On 10/05/2017 07:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfo
On 10/26/2017 10:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/10/17 20:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> Control: block -1 by 878818
>> Control: forwarded -1
>> https://release.deb
On 2/24/19 9:23 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Because the 2.18 LTR is EOL with the release of QGIS 3.4.5 having the
> latter in buster is probably better than leaving the qgis package at the
> last 2.18.x release (2.18.28).
>
> QGIS 3.4 is the new LTR and switches to Qt5 and Python 3, as such
> the
Control: retitle -1 unblock: qgis/3.4.5+dfsg-1
On 3/17/19 8:17 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2/24/19 9:23 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Because the 2.18 LTR is EOL with the release of QGIS 3.4.5 having the
>> latter in buster is probably better than leaving the qgis package
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 3/23/19 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:35:53PM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Please unblock package nsca-ng 1.5-4.
>>
>> It cherry-picks the OpenSSL 1.1.1 change from the 1.6 release available
>> in experimental.
>
> nsca-ng has no
Control: retitle -1 unblock: qgis/3.4.6+dfsg-1
On 3/17/19 11:43 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 3/17/19 8:17 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 2/24/19 9:23 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Because the 2.18 LTR is EOL with the release of QGIS 3.4.5 having the
>&
On 3/31/19 4:54 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> First of all, sorry for breaking qgis. Sip 4.19.14 was a minor release
> and I did not expect it to break anything. And I learned about this
> breakage only now.
My experience with SIP is that every new upstream release, even minor
ones, introduce break
On 3/31/19 9:02 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:24:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 3/31/19 4:54 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>>> First of all, sorry for breaking qgis. Sip 4.19.14 was a minor release
>>> and I did not expect it to br
On 11/17/2017 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 17:43:26 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> diff -Nru pyosmium-2.11.1/debian/changelog pyosmium-2.11.3/debian/changelog
>> --- pyosmium-2.11.1/debian/changelog 2017-05-05 09:51:21.0 +0200
>> +++ pyosmium-2.11.3/debian/c
On 12/04/2017 07:10 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> - gdal
gdal in experimental needs to be rebuilt too.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.3.
>>
>> Like
On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>
Please give back gdal on powerpc, it failed to build due to a g++:
internal compiler error. [0]
gb gdal_2.2.3+dfsg-1 . powerpc . -m "Retry build"
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=powerpcspe&ver=2.2.3%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1513545349&raw=0
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID
On 12/17/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
On 12/18/2017 07:19 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas C
201 - 300 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
