Hi Adam, On 08/07/2016 12:04 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 23:47 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Please binNMU python-mapnik & node-mapnik in experimental, they need to >> be rebuild with libmapnik-dev (3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp2) which depends on >> the correct libmapbox-variant-dev (from experimental not unstable). >> >> dep-wait was already set for these packages by the wanna-build team, but >> that was not sufficient for the architectures where the build had >> already failed. > > One can't binNMU a package on an architecture where it hasn't built; > that's rather by definition - a binNMU is a rebuild of the existing > binary package. > > You want give-backs, which are handled on the wanna-build side. I've > actioned them this time - and added the dep-waits on those architectures > - but please use the correct address in future.
Thanks for this. The wanna-build documentation on release.d.o [0] mentions "If you are asking for a dep-wait, an additional give-back is not needed", which seems to be incorrect based on your reply. Is the documentation outdated perhaps? [0] https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
