Robert,
am Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:45:12PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> 2011/8/8 Philipp Kern :
> > I presume that it would still unshare the volume prior to umount?
> >
> > Your change seems to contradict the OpenSolaris ZFS documentation[1]. It
> > post
arning.
There is no prompt when I do an `apt-get install --reinstall' afterwards,
so it seems that it doesn't cope with an existing installation without
debconf use.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian De
er. Furthermore it would be cool
if you could fix the ia64 FTBFS[0] first.
So yeah, having the changes in unstable and not coupling it to the
transition might be better.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qt4-x11&arch=ia64&ver=4%3A4.7.3-8&stamp=1316231009
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:07:36PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 15:14 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > so I've got nslcd installed via puppet (which probably implies
> > DEBCONF_FRONTEND=noninteractive) and nslcd.conf managed by it too. When I
> >
be informed about the regression, please make sure that an
announcement is made to the proper venue, which is -security-announce.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Relea
s, so I can build and upload.
It would be cool to have it in by Sunday. Please go ahead.
> For oldstable it's probably too late already, but let me know if an update
> could still make it.
Yep, for oldstable it's too late, I'm afraid.
Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
h=tag&users=pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org&data=gnustep-base1.22-transition
I added blocking bugs to the transition bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629477
They need to be handled before the transition can proceed further.
Kind regards,
Philipp K
proceed further.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-finger pkern/k..
e
> Adam> status of the nfs-utils upload?
> My guess is they were waiting for krb5.
> Remember they have to increase build-depends for the krb5 you just
> accepted.
AFAICS this now missed the 6.0.3 point release.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Phil
es in the
udeb output.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_0.0.20080505-4+lenny4.dsc
>
> For those affected, the bug report already gives a pointer to this
> updated version. Do you think it can be added to a possible next point
> release?
Thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
stalled-Size: [-3096-] {+520+}
> \
>
> Please could you have a look at this, and prepare an update which could
> be included in the next point release? (and most likely pushed via
> squeeze-updates in the meant
't happen with .1 or .2 (which both had
non-ABI breaking d-i kernel updates). Do you have some sort of
failure message?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
further
security updates. OTOH the updates didn't pass security anyway because
there's no non-free there. Or it's the removal of the package. Or
we simply don't care because it's freaking non-free and people are
supposed to use it in secure environments w
Please go ahead and sorry for
the delay.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cluded on the Debconf stairs that it's a tad late for
this now? That all users will have had their apparent "data loss"
already? :)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
imental now
and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to
pursue this goal for wheezy.
Kind regards and serious thanks for all your efforts,
Philipp Kern
for the Debian Release Team
[0] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110726b
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/
ne.
> Installation media - depends on partial arches
> Do we have a disc containing multiple arches?
> Dong dong dong dong dong dong (Big bell in chruch saying we've been at this
> for an hour)
> Out of time (some people need to go). So let the installer people
> decide.
break and are obliged to bump SONAME
and this would've been a transition that should've been asked for and handled
properly.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Rel
are they?
Currently there are only two developers, but that's not really worse than the
s390 port already in the archive.
Aurelien Jarno (Debian Developer)
Philipp Kern (Debian Developer)
> Is there kernel and toolchain support? At what level? Are the latest
> versions
rchive?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:23:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now
> > and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to
> >
kages and bwh's changes to linux-2.6[2].
Kind regards and thanks in advance,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/09/msg00017.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/09/msg00018.html
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :&#x
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:13:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:23:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now
> > > and dpkg in
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 0.62.2
Severity: normal
The commented-out example for squeeze-updates (${distro_codename}-updates)
provided by unattended-upgrades does not work. You actually need to specify
stable-updates to get automatic upgrades.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
Hi,
let this be a gentle reminder that if you are deciding that we should switch
away from Spacefun, that work on it should start soon and a decision be
taken a bit before we actually freeze.
Thanks,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
:
stallable)
binNMUs scheduled.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stable Release Manager
`-
ajor annoyance for every person who customizes those files. I think
that if we want a programmatical way to access this information, this should
be solved by a separate package with a file not in /etc, probably with
LSB compliance in mind.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp
too recent to consider.
Do you have a link for the diff handy?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
out various architectures and no longer supports
arm{,el} you can ask for the binary removal, otherwise I think the build
should be fixed. (It's schily stuff, though.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
bugfixes to testing.
Given back, on the grounds that the build-deps are now installable.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 08:11:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> please let me know if the following diff (against 2.42a-7.1+etch1) seems
> acceptable to you.
It is, please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Develo
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:32:58PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:21:35AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:23:07AM +, peter green wrote:
> > > according to http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=universalindentgui
> &
-
copyright infringement in fp-compiler
--
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:30:12PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> This means that we need to remove fpc, gearhead, imapcopy, libhdate (all
> three b-dep on fpc), libhdate-pascal (deps on fpc) and hdate-applet (depends
> on libhdate).
Minor correction: I contacted the hdate maintainer Ba
ntains potentially undistributable code
Hi there,
I don't get from the bug log why this package should be removed from
stable. Could you please elaborate on that? (Especially I did not
find anything about potentially undistributable code.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUB
x is included in Lenny.
Done, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stable Release Manager
`-
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:26:58AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Please let net-tools into testing:
Hint added, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assi
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:15:03PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I want to request unblock of vserver-debiantools package because
> the RC bug #507662 has been fixed. Lenny install always hang and
> that is not a good thing.
Unblocked, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.'&#x
has a Recommends on texlive-latex-bin which cannot be satisfied on $any.
Package has a Suggests on ghostpcl | gspcl | ghostpdl | pcl6 which cannot be
satisfied on $any.
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=pkpgcounter
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp K
so a proper upload should work. The package should not be outdated on
the buildds, so you should take the risk. It might need some handholding
on sparc because nut did not build there yet (I gave it back) but please
contact us again if this is the case.
Kind regards,
Philipp
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:52:19PM +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Please unblock tkabber 0.11.1-3 from entering testing.
Done, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 04:55:01PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> So, this only touches translations and documentation. It would be nice
> if you would unblock collectd-4.4.2-3.
Done.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Develo
delay.
Please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stable Release Manager
`-fi
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:27:13AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> My bad. pkpgcounter 3.50-4 not recommends texlive-latex-base, and
> doesn't suggest anything. Please consider unblocking this.
>
> Apologies, and thanks.
Done.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.&
to
> > the timestamp would be perfect.
> >
> > 1. http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html
> That'd help keep an eye on that page with an appropriate timing, because
> stable uploads aren't that frequent, and one may fear messing up with
> the uplo
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:01:24PM +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> After speaking to HE, attached is a diff that will only fix the bug for
> testing.
Please go ahead with the upload.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Develo
ed this, an upload of libtemplate-perl to t-p-u
> > will follow, adding the dependency on libtemplate-plugin-dbi-perl.
> Is it possible to get this done?
Unblocked.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' :
eat to get this into Lenny.
unblocked, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Rel
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r6
=
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (etch) and will send reports so people can actually
comment on it and intervene whenever this is required.
If you disagree with one bit or anoth
; to proposed the attached debdiff for a s-p-u upload (another upload
> for sid will be uploaded soon, and then an unblock requested).
>
> Is this upload acceptable for you?
Yes, and please upload ASAP.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
he unstable version instead of the
stable one. Please provide a targetted fix for stable. Rejecting.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `&#x
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 04:37:51PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r6
> =
>
> Accepted Packages
> -
>
> These packages will be installed into the stable Debian distribution
> and will be p
bout missing includes,
curiousingly it still built in testing on its last tpu upload on all
architectures. (10)+(11) 'nuff said.
I would like to re-upload 0.4.8-1 to tpu as 0.4.8-1~lenny1 with the French
translation refreshed.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philip
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 06:37:33PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > I would like to re-upload 0.4.8-1 to tpu as 0.4.8-1~lenny1 with the French
> > translation refreshed.
> Please upload.
Uploaded, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
o kvm in version kvm_72+dfsg-4.
> Please unblock it, too.
Both unblocked, thanks.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x
u base it on the stable version.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-fi
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:38:21PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Please let 3.4f-2 enter lenny from sid.
Unblocked.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assist
Hi there,
the recent logwatch upload to unstable fixes a regular expression which
otherwise clutters up the output of the dpkg log checks. This happens
with Lenny's dpkg and should thus go in. The other change is an
adjustment of the manpage.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`
ear until all people did their year-end closings,
but considering that the symbol might/should still be on their keyboards,
all should be well.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:38:07PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> What is the process for signing the Debian Release files?
The file is signed just after a point release after checking dak's result
for sanity with a key that is to be kept offline all the other time.
Kind regards,
Phil
DSA - would it be
> suitable for a stable update? I've attached a minimal debdiff.
Would be acceptable, but I wonder if the usage of $TEMP_DIR after cd
and rm should be quoted?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian D
ld be ok "as-is").
Please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manag
I think is acceptable, so
please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
n place
to see which binNMU version we are currently reusing. So it might become
moot, but I think we should open some window here. 20 looks overly large
(there really should not be more than 2 binNMUs per point release) but
it would also be a safe choice after all.
Kind regards,
Philipp Ke
So clamav is not sufficently modular to separate the library and the scan
engines? Ho hum.
Anyway I would not be glad if packages would be moved to volatile only
without being present in unstable at all.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebi
> lenny.
Both are there now. Thanks, Lamont.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable R
e,
I don't think we have time to include this arch-specific upload. It can
surely be updated for r1 too and be put into backports in the meantime
which we suppose to be activated if you want to prepare stuff for backports.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
s'. TIA.
(NB: Do not upload it just yet, but after the release.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de
rity bug.
I would not like to see updates just for l10n, but if you prepare an
upload for proposed-updates anyway it's fine IMHO. I do not think that
we see (more than a few maybe) updates for l10n through security, though.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:56:32AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > During a discussion about future translation work for dpkg [0], we
> > wondered what was the actual policy regarding oportunistic translation
> >
an upload prepared by the maintainer that is appropriately
tested so that the issues are indeed confirmed as fixed. The bug log did
not look that conclusive.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
g us again. And
remember: no new packages.
Thanks in advance,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Releas
Added.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.
to hit with the 2.12.11 version currently in lenny, including several
> crashers.
Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it
spends "plenty" of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i
testing with the new binaries will bring us.
Kind regards,
Philipp
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:35:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient.
> It's simply a MISTAKE that has been done by the last maintainer of yum,
> python-pyme is NOT the correct python package, python
*not* decided during DC8 or anything. And especially not such a
crude "one week of orphanness is enough time" rule. After all, they should
be adopted, not dropped at first sight.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
:
ny-proposed-
> updates?
I want to see the patch first. I don't agree with the snippet proposed
in the bug report.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
ould doublecheck them.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-finger pkern/k...@
d in this case and I think that the propagation
algorithm in dak may be broken currently.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> The packages to give-back are:
Thanks for using the syntax. Done.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 04:08:43PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Philipp Kern [2009-02-27 13:42]:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> > > The packages to give-back are:
> > Thanks for using the syntax. Done.
> I keep forgetting
etch-backports
> stanza will be produced instead.
> + Correctly increment backport version numbers.
> * rc-alert: Modify the description of the "I" flag to refer to the
> squeeze-ignore tag rather than etch-ignore.
Hm, not lenny-ignore? Should it target the current or th
inly wrong.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-finger pkern/k...@db.d
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:49:46PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Do I have permission to upload them, please?
Yes, please.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
from the changelog
> entry.
Please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release M
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:24:23PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’d like to propose a GDM update for the 5.0.1 point release, in order
> to fix #495797 (XDMCP being broken on many setups).
Please go ahead with the targetted fix then.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''
can easily get rid of
that.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager
`-finger pkern/k.
t; Accepted.
according to more recent findings by DSA the problem is still not fixed
on ia64, i.e. it still crashes. \-:
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Rel
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:45:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> would the attached debdiff for bug#520547 be accepted in lenny?
Yep.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
2.2-1~lenny1 (or whatever
> number is most appropriate for you). This will fix the current
> breakage on Alpha systems.
Somehow I'd like a backported fix more (with 1.2.1-1+lenny1), but if it's
really only a really huge chunk of documentation and autotools foo and
you convince m
reference, the patch is attached.
Apart from the unappealing changelog entry: what does it solve, exactly?
Just ignore the opendir failure without any warning?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : h
on without that entry. I see no point in warning
> about the opendir failure, since irqbalance can't, by definition, do
> anything about IRQs the kernel hasn't set up /proc entries for.
In this case: ACK. Thanks for the clarification.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.'
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a
> fixed package be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates?
With the plain obvious fix being a dep on oss-compat?
Kind regards,
Philip
Hallo Rafael,
am Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:38:04PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> * Philipp Kern [2009-03-25 16:15]:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a
>
ilt itself and this would require an upload (even
if no changes are done) to proposed-updates.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
`. `' xmpp:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:43:03PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> would you accept an upload of asciidoc to s-pu-u, fixing one serious and two
> important bugs:
I would, please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Develo
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18:55AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Could I have the go-ahead to upload schroot_1.2.2-0+lenny1 to
> stable-proposed-updates please?
Go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :'
pa buildd will
> build it.
done. Please direct further requests to debian-wb-t...@lists.d.o.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Britney does not look at the Breaks field yet which led to a broken
testing. This should, of course, be fixed.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : htt
301 - 400 of 1035 matches
Mail list logo
