On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:27:16AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes: > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > >> also sprach Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> [2009.02.11.0800 > >> +0100]: > >> Please do. Having a devscripts in lenny whose dch is not aware of > >> lenny-* (of which lenny-volatile is official and lenny-backports > >> almost so) is IMHO unacceptable. > > Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds > > those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still > > create an etch-backports upload, but I haven't changed that in order to > > keep the diff minimal and because --bpo is a convenience method). > Please upload.
Apart from the fact that devscripts might be something for volatile, I don't think we have time to include this arch-specific upload. It can surely be updated for r1 too and be put into backports in the meantime which we suppose to be activated if you want to prepare stuff for backports. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Stable Release Manager `- finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
