On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 07:29:56PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Sorry about that - I didn't realize that libalien-wxwidgets-perl had a
> dependency on an exact wxWidgets version (this is probably unnecessary; just
> a major.minor one is probably sufficient - that's what wxPython has).
Unfortunate
match the previously
+ committed state. Closes: #1032398
+
+ -- Olly Betts Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:20:07 +1300
+
xapian-core (1.4.18-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/rules: Workaround testcase sensitivity to excess precision by
diff -Nru xapian-core-1.4.18/debian/patches/fix-db-corruption-on-ENOS
unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/fix-epsg-esri-cs.patch: Fix coordinate system handling when
+more than one coordinate system is specified using an EPSG or ESRI code.
+(Closes: #930289)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:33:11 +1200
+
therion (5.4.3ds1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
severity 1019823 serious
severity 1019775 serious
severity 1019768 serious
severity 1019812 serious
severity 1019835 serious
severity 1019769 serious
severity 1019799 serious
severity 1019827 serious
severity 1019808 serious
severity 1019830 serious
severity 1019762 serious
severity 1019829 serious
severity 1019833 serious
thanks
(I raised the severity of most of these yesterday, but missed packages
where an upload to experimental has closed the bug while it's not yet
fixed in unstable.)
Accounting for packages which are fixed in experimental or in git we're
now under 30 packages left to do
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 08:47:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Are we planning to complete this transition
> > in buster (transition deadline being 2019-01-05) or it is fine if this
> > transition is first
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:25:54AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
> > That only partially answers my question. Currently I am playing with the
> > thought if the right idea would be uploading a wxMaxima version that
> > uses GTK3 to debian testing and lo
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:26:00PM +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
> Making separate bug reports for that, too, and bisecting them costs more
> time than I currently have at hand. Which is why I asked if we
> absolutely need to switch to GTK3.
There's no *absolute* need, but it's unlikely wxmaxima
severity 933407 serious
severity 933408 serious
severity 933411 serious
severity 933412 serious
severity 933415 serious
severity 933416 serious
severity 933419 serious
severity 933424 serious
severity 933425 serious
severity 933426 serious
severity 933427 serious
severity 933431 serious
severity 93
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 08:29:50AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> Now that we're post-release, Scott Talbert has filed bugs and the
> transition is progressing well (we've gone from 17% to 41% in just
> a week).
We're now at 94% with only 3 packages left:
* mrpt was updated
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 08:58:42AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> * mrpt was updated but the build failed on mipsel due to running out of
> memory and it's now entangled in auto-opencv. But it's due for AUTORM
> on 2019-10-28 so that should resolve itself within a we
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:27:48AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 08:58:42AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> > * mrpt was updated but the build failed on mipsel due to running out of
> > memory and it's now entangled in auto-opencv. But it's due for AUTO
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I'd like to transition the archive to Xapian 1.4 before the next
release.
There are packages of xapian-core 1.4.0 in experimental. I maintain
xapian-bindings and xapian-omega, and packa
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-xapian-core.html
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:55:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/09/16 06:50, Olly Betts wrote:
> > I've test rebuilt the other reverse dependencies and they all built
> &
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:28:27PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:55:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 13/09/16 06:50, Olly Betts wrote:
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-xapian-core.html
> >
> > Go ahead!
&g
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:14:00PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> block 844486 by 844526
> thanks
>
> wxwidget should be binnmued to fix the bug properly.
I don't believe there's actually any real bug here, let alone an RC one.
GCC makes small fixes to obscure corner cases of the C++ ABI from time
cancel() or when the database is
reopened, and flag the current cursor version as used when a cursor is
rebuilt.
.
Fixes database corruption issues with certain usage patterns, which recoll
can trigger.
Author: Olly Betts
Origin: upstream, https://trac.xapian.org/changeset/826d1a19cc356e7bf66c1681626e
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:35:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 17:06 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> > The attached patch is from the upstream git repo - it's been on git
> > master since 2015-04-28, an
possible database corruption, especially with recoll. (Closes: #808610)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:13:31 +1200
+
xapian-core (1.2.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
* New patch fix-db-write-lock.patch which fixes database write locking to
diff -Nru
xapian-core-1.2.12/debian/patches/incr
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:47:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, now uploaded.
Cheers,
Olly
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:38:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, now uploaded.
Cheers,
Olly
). (Closes: #857693)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:48:18 +1200
+
xapian-core (1.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru xapian-core-1.4.3/debian/patches/fix-unweighted-and.patch
xapian-core-1.4.3/debian/patches/fix-unweighted-and.patch
--- xapian-core-1.4.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 08:47:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> What is the status on this?
Less progress than I'd like. Partly that's down to my not finding the
time to push this along, but there are also two bugs which affect the
GTK3 wx build but not the GTK2 one:
OpenGL support doesn't work
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Upstream xapian-core 1.4.6 added C++11 move constructors and move
assignment operators when code using the xapian API is built with a
C++11 or newer compiler, which GCC in unstable is by defa
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 12:29:54PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> The new xapian-core was uploaded close to two days ago and has
> now built everywhere except kfreebsd-*.
It's now built everywhere.
> I'll recheck in a week in case there any further binary uploads built
> again
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
This is a follow-up to my previous request binnmu request:
https://bugs.debian.org/910549
Unfortunately I failed to include any epochs on the version numbers for
the packages (because the e
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
This is a second follow-up to my previous request binnmu request:
https://bugs.debian.org/910549
Since then, packagesearch 2.7.10 was uploaded to unstable with amd64
binaries built against
eelist blocks in corner cases
+which then get reported as "DatabaseCorruptError" by Database::check().
+(Closes: #912883)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:47:57 +1300
+
xapian-core (1.4.3-2+deb9u2) stretch; urgency=medium
* fix-glass-cursor-bug.patch: Fix glass ba
patch: Fix segmentation fault when
+producing SVG output. (Closes: #923737)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:41:20 +1300
+
therion (5.4.3ds1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/tests/therion: Give up trying to compare output images for now -
diff -Nru therion-5.4.3ds1/debian/patche
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libwx-perl_1:0.9932-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against rebuilt
libalien-wxwidgets-perl."
After a new upstream upload of wxwidgets3.0, libalien-wxwidgets-perl needs
a binnmu bec
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
There are now packages with a GTK3 build of wxwidgets3.0, and these have
just migrated to testing. We'd like to start to encourage dependent
packages to switch to this instead of the GTK
-2018-0499-mset-snippet-escaping.patch (Closes: #902886)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Fri, 06 Jul 2018 09:52:48 +1200
+
xapian-core (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix incorrect results for unweighted AND with certain subqueries (new
diff -Nru
xapian-core-1.4.3/debian/patches/cve-2018-0499-ms
n-core (1.4.3-2+deb9u2) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * fix-glass-cursor-bug.patch: Fix glass backend bug with long-lived cursors
+on a table in a WritableDatabase which could incorrectly lead to
+DatabaseCorruptError being thrown when the database was actually OK.
+(Closes: #906007)
+
+ -
Xapian 1.2.0 was released this week, and I'd like to try to get it in for
squeeze - it's smaller, faster, has more features, and will be supported by
upstream for more of the life of squeeze.
For Debian, "Xapian" means source packages xapian-core, xapian-bindings,
xapian-omega, and libsearch-xapia
On 2010-04-30, I wrote:
> Xapian 1.2.0 was released this week, and I'd like to try to get it in for
> squeeze - it's smaller, faster, has more features, and will be supported by
> upstream for more of the life of squeeze.
>
> For Debian, "Xapian" means source packages xapian-core, xapian-bindings,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 02:48:40AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> On 2010-04-30, I wrote:
> > I'm tracking status here:
> >
> > http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/DebianXapian1.2.0
>
> I've now checked all the reverse dependencies. Three packages need a small
> patc
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 00:31 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 02:48:40AM +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> > > On 2010-04-30, I wrote:
> > > > http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/DebianXapi
On 2010-05-14, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> The primary issue I can see is that the Xapian transition overlaps with
>> the apt transition. Both are in turn currently blocked by the fact that
>> aptitude FTBFS on s390
On 2010-07-01, Olly Betts wrote:
> So I think that means that the only overlap for Xapian now is with the
> apt transition.
>
> Is there a plan for what order to do things in? I'm likely to be packaging
> a new upstream release (Xapian 1.2.2) in the next few days, so was j
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:29:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead with the upload of xapian 1.2 to unstable.
Uploaded.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 01:26:57PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 01:51 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> > I've discussed these with the security team, and they decided it was most
> > appropriate to handle them via a stable update. I've attached a debdif
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:37:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've just marked the squeeze upload for acceptance at the next dinstall;
> thanks.
Thanks.
> > An upload for oldstable would also be okay. (Note that the upload
> > window for next weekend's oldstable point release closed last ni
Hello,
xapian-bindings 1.0.10-1 was uploaded 19 days ago. It's ready to
migrate apart from a missing mips build. The buildd logs show it
built successfully on mips on feb 21st, but it seems this build
never got uploaded.
I mailed m...@buildd.d.o on Monday, but no response so far.
So please cou
On 2007-04-21, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:41:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> d-r:
>
>> ruby1.8_1.8.6-1, rebuild against latest libc6-dev to drop eaccess from
>> missing.h, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390
>> sparc
>
>
recoll needs a binNMU to get rebuilt against xapian-core 1.0.1-1
because the shlib version has increased - the shared library package is
now libxapian15 not libxapian13.
According to buildd.d.o, xapian-core 1.0.1-1 is already built and
installed for all architectures:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg
On 2007-06-15, Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> recoll needs a binNMU to get rebuilt against xapian-core 1.0.1-1
> because the shlib version has increased - the shared library package is
> now libxapian15 not libxapian13.
This binNMU is still required, and is now blocking t
On 2008-07-29, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
>> I've just uploaded to unstable the Xapian suite version 1.0.7, that was
>> the candidate for lenny.
>>
>> It didn't manage to get uploaded so far because of last minute
>> polishings and work delayed due to me (sponsor) an
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:38:09PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Olly Betts [Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:48:32 +]:
>
> > I'd also like to ask you to consider adding hints for the rest of the
> > "Xapian suite" - that's:
>
> > xapian-omega 1.0.7-2
&
@brief Convert a Xapian::Query::Internal tree into an optimal PostList tree.
*/
-/* Copyright (C) 2007 Olly Betts
+/* Copyright (C) 2007,2008 Olly Betts
* Copyright (C) 2008 Lemur Consulting Ltd
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -245,7 +245,30 @
Hi Thomas,
On 2008-10-07, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olly Betts wrote:
>> I'd like the release team's opinion on whether the bug described below
>> is worth fixing for lenny. I'm happy to, but don't want to expend
>> effort pre
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:20:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Please upload.
OK, xapian-core 1.0.7-4 was uploaded and has now spent 13 days in
unstable. Everything looks good except the hppa build is missing,
though there's a log showing it successfully built there on October
14th:
http://buildd.
s: #695542)
+ * New patch replication-above-32GB.patch which fixes database replication to
+handle files > 32GB. (Closes: #695643)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:22:04 +
+
xapian-core (1.2.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru xapian-core-1.2.
Closes: #855490)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:23:38 +1300
+
xapian-omega (1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/control: Regenerate from debian/control.in to pick up missing
diff -Nru xapian-omega-1.4.3/debian/patches/fix-term-based-date-ranges.patch
xapian-omega-1.4.3/debian/p
ncy=medium
+
+ * Force building as C++98 for now to fix FTBFS of qutemol and perhaps
+other rdeps since recent binNMU with a GCC version which defaults
+to C++11. Patch from Adrian Bunk. (Closes: #856350)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:15:40 +1300
+
wxwidgets3.0 (3.0.2+dfsg-2) unstabl
loses: #755757):
++ New patch: wxpython3.0.patch
+
+ -- Olly Betts Sat, 20 Sep 2014 02:45:20 +
+
cecilia (5.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru cecilia-5.0.9/debian/patches/series cecilia-5.0.9/debian/patches/series
--- cecilia-5.0.9/debian/patches/series 20
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:43:19AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/09/14 05:21, Olly Betts wrote:
> > Control: tags 755757 + patch
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > With the attached patch, the wx-related errors I originally got are gone,
> >
Control: reopen -1
> cecilia (5.0.9-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* Update for wxPython 3.0 (Closes: #755757):
> + New patch: wxpython3.0.patch
Aargh - I put the wrong bug number in the changelog entry, reopening...
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
So the ben file I originally sent has a couple of annoying issues:
One is that packages which recommend or s
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:52:27AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/10/14 23:43, Olly Betts wrote:
> >The result of these is that the tracker no longer presents useful
> >information - most of the listed packages are actually fixed already,
> >but several packa
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 766790 by -1
nmu wxmaxima_13.04.2-4 xmlcopyeditor_1.2.0.12-1.1 . amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386
i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild
f
ral to dh_python2.
+(Closes: #684150)
+
+ -- Olly Betts Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:37:03 +
+
wxwidgets2.8 (2.8.12.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
* It looks like upstream may not make another 2.8 release, and if they do
diff -Nru wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control
wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/
It looks like the migration to testing of the latest xapian packages is
now only blocked by recursive dependencies:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xapian-core;expand=1
If this needs manual intervention to resolve, the source packages
involved are:
xapian-core
xapian-omega
xapian-
I notice that vorlon has added an urgent hint for xapian-bindings to
help new versions of php4 and/or php5 move to testing.
However, due to versioned dependencies, this hint won't help unless
xapian-core and xapian-omega are also hinted as urgent too (they were
uploaded at the same time and have s
On 2006-11-27, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there perhaps *missing* dependencies that should be here?
D'oh! My (currently somewhat fuzzy) head noticed the hint had been
there for a couple of days and reached the wrong conclusion as to why
(the comment in the hints file itself n
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is mail from upstream about minor patch to fix uninstallability
> > of survex-aven on hppa. I assume this is OK to upload via unstable,
> > and with urgency high? I have the package
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Olly Betts wrote:
> > The hppa binNMU was 1.0.39+b1.
> >
> > Wookey uploaded 1.0.39-1, which has built for all architectures
> > including hppa, but the hppa upload was rejected because 1.0.39-1 is a
> &g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
README.Debian says that src/generator/generator_wword{6,8}.htm have been
removed from the repacked wv2_0.4.2.dfsg.1.orig.tar.bz2, but they are
still present.
These two files are based on docume
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
README.Debian says that src/generator/generator_wword{6,8}.htm have been
removed from the repacked wv2_0.4.2.dfsg.1.orig.tar.bz2, but they are
still present.
These two files are based on docum
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> What version were you proposing to use for the re-repack?
I'm open to guidance as to what's best.
The repacked upstream tarball would be the same as testing/unstable has,
so perhaps 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb7+1 (and 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb6+1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:29:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo squeeze
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:32 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: serious
>
>
Sorry, I'm an idiot and uploaded a new version of sffview, despite being
aware of this transition. If the upload causes any problems for the
transition, please just boot sffview out of testing - it's a leaf
package.
It does seem to build fine with boost 1.54 at least.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To U
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
It would be good if we could eliminate wxwidgets2.8 from the archive for
jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago, and
there's very little upstream interest in bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block 748169 by -1
Control: block -1 by 749974 749976 749978
I'm filing this on behalf of gcs (the wxsqlite3 maintainer) who's in
X-Debbugs-Cc.
As part of the wxwidgets3.0 trans
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:22:49AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/06/14 08:49, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > It's up to the guayadeque and maitreya packages
> > to make the update for wxSqlite 3.0 now.
>
> Are there bugs for those? Please make them block this one.
They already
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 734799
This is a follow-on from the wxwidgets3.0 transition. The wxwidgets2.8
source package actually contains the wxpython source, which has an
embedded copy of wxw
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
> > The intention is to eliminate wxwidgets2.8 (and hence wxpython 2.8) before
> > releasing jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago,
> > an
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:43:09AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 10:19:53PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> > wrote:
> > > With guayadeque gone from testing because upstream is switching to qt,
> > > what'
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 07:56:59PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > An updated wxsqlite3 package is already in experimental.
>
> Go ahead.
Thanks - to get things moving, I've NMUed the wxsqlite3 version in
experimental to unstable, with one trivial fix for a failure to
substitute @VERSION
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 07:50:56AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Why do you NMU my package after five hours? I'm active and wanted to
> upload 3.1.1 with more fixes. Now I'm going to wait not to clash with
> the transition.
Sorry, I didn't mean to annoy anyone.
There no problem with y
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Asking what will happen with packages depending on wxPython 2.8 and
> which cannot be converted to 3.0.
There aren't many incompatible changes between wxPython 2.8 and 3.0.
With the C++ API, the Unicode changes have been quite painf
80 matches
Mail list logo
