reopen 990059
affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
thanks
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian,
>
> thanks for working on this issue in between times, I wasn't able to do
> anything practically the last days.
>
> Am 18.06.21
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 07:57:30AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> reopen 990059
> affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian,
> >
> > thanks for
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 08:14:45AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 07:57:30AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > reopen 990059
> > affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten S
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: binnmu transition
Hi,
Recent versions of libnss3 had a backwards incompatible change that made
packages built with the newer versions fail to work properly with the older
version of the package that is in bullseye.
That wouldn't be a prob
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:54:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:36 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:00:57PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 09:37 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > > > If there are no objections, I
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:04:17PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:34:01AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:54:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:36 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
libnss3-dev 2:3.89-1 introduced an incompatibility that made builds
against it fail to work with older versions of libnss3. 2:3.89-2 fixed
that. Firefox-esr is also affected, but I'm going to
refox-esr (102.9.0esr-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * gfx/skia/generate_mozbuild.py, gfx/skia/moz.build: Remove explicit NEON
+flags from skia build. Closes: #982794. Thanks Emanuele Rocca.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Sat, 18 Mar 2023 06:53:38 +0900
+
+firefox-esr (102.9.0esr-1) unstable; urgency=m
Hi,
Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
weeks or months without it happening?
Mike
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:24:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Mike Hommey:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
> > weeks or months without it happening?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> Hi Mike,
>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:39:20AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:59:20 +, Angus Lees wrote:
>
> > Dear SRMs,
> >
> > My understanding is that Debian's new-ish plan is to update firefox-esr
> > versions in stable when there is a security update and the firefox-esr
>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:28:31AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > [ Please note the cross-post and respect the Reply-To... ]
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This has taken a while in coming, for which I apologise. There's a lot
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:46:41PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > .
> >
> > Note that Firefox is built with --no-keep-memory
> > --reduce-memory-overheads, and that was still not enough for 32-bts
&
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:09:12PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> firefox-esr since 52.2.0esr-1 is no longer using the system libs for
> nspr, nss, sqlite; was that an intentional change?
>
> This affects at least sid (where DIST="stretch"):
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.p
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>> Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
> >>> happens b
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:08:11AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > >> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshir
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
Hi,
The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and
led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xulrunner-1.9.1.
The script was fixed in 1.9.1.6-2 and to ensure it will continue to work
in the future, I added a test during the xulrunner build.
I've checked all the bui
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and
> led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xulrunner-1.9.1.
>
> The script was fixed in 1.9.1.6-2 and to ensure it will continu
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and
> > led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xu
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:39:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > nmu
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:41:00AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>>>>nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2
> >>>>>gnome-py
Hi,
In case you don't read my blog, it appears that there were hidden issues
in the mozilla code base on arm, mips, sparc and powerpc.
Question is: should we update the stable packages with the relevant
patches ?
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
> yet fixed in unstable.
>
> We would like to know what ne
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 07:23:54PM +0100, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:30:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> > > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
> >
>
Hi,
I don't remember where I got this idea that the freeze was expected to
happen somewhen late this month, but I was taken by surprise by the
freeze happening already. Anyways, the mozilla packages I take care of
are in a releasable shape already, but there are more changes that I was
planning to
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:32:54AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > - Possibly remove the libmozillainterfaces-java package. It is
> > apparently unused, not really maintained upstream (it's even being
> > removed from current trunk, in favor of a separate repository if a
> > maintainer shows
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:23:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, August 12, 2010 06:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> - Iceweasel and xulrunner are currently two separate source packages,
> >> sharing th
.
So, I hereby request that the cairo maintainers be allowed to upload a
new cairo version with the patch mentioned below.
Thanks,
Mike
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:08:07PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:59 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> - Possibly remove the libmozillainterfaces-java package. It is
> apparently unused, not really maintained upstream (it's even being
> removed from current trunk, in favor of a separate repository if a
> ma
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:49:49PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
> There's a problem with SQLite3 3.7.0 in Squeeze.
> The version in testing (3.6.23.1-4) was suitable to release. Next major
> upstream version (3.7.0) was released, which was uploaded to unstable.
> Then free
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
> >
>
> If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
>
> [1] http://release.debian.org/tran
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> >
> >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
> >>There is a complete list here [0], but those
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:58:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> These two are the main part of what constitutes 3.5.11-2 currently in
> unstable. It would probably make sense for you to start reviewing it, so
> that further steps get easier to review. I'm attaching a detailed
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyxpcom
As part of what could be called the iceweasel/xulrunner package overhaul,
the python-xpcom binary package is now built from the pyxpcom source
package. Now th
Dear release team,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:47:07AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 18:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:45 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > As I've been asked to convince you to allow a new cairo upload w
+binary in the form of an alternative, and a corresponding manual page.
+ * debian/smjs.1, debian/control*: Add a note that smjs is not recommended
+for production use.
+
+ * extensions/auth/nsHttpNegotiateAuth.cpp: Calculate negotiate auth token
+ length after removing padding. bz#592
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:49:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > Hi Release Team,
> >
> >
> > In the next few days upstream will release chromium 6 in the stable
> > channel. This means that v5 will not receive any further (security)
>
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
>
> Is it too late to campaign for iceweasel 3.6.8 in Squeeze?
>
> The reason I ask is that I have never able to play flash videos in
> iceweasel (under linux) without stuttering, and random freezes of
> the video (but the audio continue).
>
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:24AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
>
> >Are you volunteering to make all packages depending on xulrunner and
> >libmozjs build and proper
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
> for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
> to apply the attached debian changes, to both code and
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:50:11AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> So xulrunner needs to be fixed and/or nspr 4.8.6 unblocked from sid.
It will be fixed. The pkg-config files are wrong. They are unfortunately
generated using the nspr version as taken from nspr-config --version,
that is, the version
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:45:24AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Di, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:42:05 (CEST), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> >> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
> >> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
> >> checking
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [3] A question you might have at this point is: "why you bother about
> Chromium and not other packages?". Well, I do bother about all
> packages and I'm just trying to anticipate questions I'll might be
> asked as so
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > [3] A question you might have at this point is: "why you bother about
> > Chromium and not other packages?". Well, I do bother about
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:17:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 17:09 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano a écrit :
> > On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
> >
> > What was changed from lenny to now?
>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [2] Chromium or iceweasel; take your pick since backports is being
> suggested as a delivery mechanism for both.
There is a difference with Iceweasel, though, in that squeeze will ship
with Iceweasel.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:19:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
> > lot of this concern.
>
> Unless it installs the package from backports, the most the installer
> can do is eliminate one or two of the th
ld npapi_getinfo in
+build-xulrunner/dist/bin, and use an RPATH. Some plugins depend on
+libxpcom.so, and dlopen() from npapi_getinfo fails unless libxpcom.so
+can be loaded too. Fixes FTBFS on hppa as a side effect.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:42:37 +0200
+
iceweasel (3.
3.5.16/debian/patches/debian-hacks/Add-a-2-minutes-timeout-on-automation.py-driven-test.patch 2011-01-07 14:10:28.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+From: Mike Hommey
+Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:50:20 +0100
+Subject: Add a 2 minutes timeout on automation.py-driven tests
+
+---
+ build/automation.py.i
20100212/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+pyxpcom (1:0.0~hg20100212-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/postinst.in: Fix symbolic link destination, and fix the way
+it is created.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:04:50 +0100
+
+pyxpcom (1:0.0~hg20100212-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:47:21PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:40:42 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:12:39PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Heya,
> > > >
> >
does't
+support DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+ * debian/control: Lower build depends on dpkg-dev to (>= 1.13.19), which
+was the value before starting to use DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:35 +0100
+
nss (3.12.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> > > I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
>
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 13 mai 2011 à 09:19 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > However, by the time wheezy is released, Firefox will have had several
> > new releases. And the current embedding API (gtkembedmoz) has already b
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Any insight from the release team?
> >
> What's the list of affected packages?
Most libmozjs-dev and xulrunner-dev build-rdeps. Unfortun
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > Any insight from the release team?
> > >
> > What
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > >
&
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs 5.0"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pyxpcom_1:2.0~hg20110502-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against xulrunner 5.0"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'expe
Hi,
I just uploaded iceweasel 5.0 to unstable. Sorry for any unexpected
disturbance this may bring.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011071509
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openvrml_0.18.8-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 5.0"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:17:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> severity 636514 normal
> thanks
>
> I really do not have any trust in some member of the release team filing this
> kind of reports. Please think twice before doing this.
>
>
> On 08/03/2011 07:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Pac
reassign 637195 release.debian.org
retitle 637195 nmu: iceweasel_5.0-6
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:59:07PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: xulrunner-5.0
> Version: 5.0-6
> Severity: normal
> User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: libnotify0.7-transition
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 6.0"
dw dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m "libmozjs-dev (>= 6.0)"
nmu gjs_1.29.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:41:32AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 6.0"
> dw dehy
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 29 novembre 2008 à 18:30 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> > > Try rebuilding epiphany against xulrunner 1.9.0.4-2 and see if that
> > > still happens.
> >
> > Good news--I haven't seen this crash since rebuilding epiphany a
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 03:43:35PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:23:03AM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> > I have a feeling that the libwebkit currently in sid and lenny is pretty
> > broken, from the looks of this bug.
> >
>
> Unfortunately, we don't seem to be able to
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 04:21:05PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Thanks Alexander,
>
> Be advised that the normal approach to fixing a RC bug during lenny deep
> freeze is by back porting the fix, rather than uploading the new upstream
> release.
>
> Have debian-release been engaged?
We (the mo
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >>> Luk Claes wrote:
> Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes?
> >>> I'll do that in the next days.
> >> Ok, than
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >>> On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes wrote:
> >>>> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
Hi,
I uploaded a new security/stability releases of iceweasel and xulrunner
that may be good to have in Lenny, but it might be good to wait and see
if no big regression comes with them.
Please do as you think is most appropriate considering the timing.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:59:48PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > severity 514132 grave
> > thanks
> >
> > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about
> > 80%)
> > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is
+ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nss (3.12.0-6) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_object.h:
+Apply patch from upstream to fix alignment issues on sparc and ia64.
+Closes: #509930.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:2
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
> (as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
> anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploadi
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:19:00PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is just to inform you that there will be soon a point release of
> Etch: 4.0r8 tomorrow and Lenny: 5.0.1 on Saturday.
>
> In a point release packages in oldstable or stable will get updated.
> Most of these packages will alr
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
>> (as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
>> anything using nss OC
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I'm told Mike was looking into this, but it indeed looks like circular
> Build-Dependencies...
The possible long-term solution is to split libJavaScriptCore out of
libwebkit, but I don't see that happening in the very near future, a
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:32:02PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 15:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a
> écrit :
> > > Mike, Emilio, can you coordinate so that any sensible solution is
> > > implemented reasonably soon? A good number of packages build-depend on
> > >
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:32:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Luk Claes schrieb:
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Grant Grundler schrieb:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:49:26AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Grant Grundler wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Neil McGov
Hi,
While going through the list of bugs for libxml2, I was wondering what
to do with #142172, which I tagged wontfix almost 6 years ago, when I
became libxml2 maintainer, because of the status quo between the
reporter and the previous maintainer.
I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:15:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a
> >> transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how t
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
> > Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in Dece
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > Heya,
> > >
> > > As announced on dda [RT1], we want
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 12:16:53PM +0200, Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:32:14AM +0200, Martin Grimm wrote:
> > So as long as there is no easy manual way to provide anonymized figures
> > without installing software on our production servers we can't deliver
> > such data :-(
>
Hi,
I have some probable good news. Some testing seems to show that while
ABI incompatible (stuff built with xulrunner 1.9 don't work quite well
with xulrunner 1.9.1), xulrunner 1.9.1 is mostly API compatible and
reverse build dependencies seem to be okay with only a few changes
(runtime dependenc
g the packages today to
hopefully upload them today or tomorrow.
- Upload xulrunner 1.9.1 to unstable tomorrow.
- Request BinNMUs for packages currently depending on libmozjs1d.
Cheers,
Mike
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:57:02AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some probable g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mediatomb_0.12.0~svn2018-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openjdk-6_6b16-1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for xulrunner/libmozjs
transition"
The build should be done against xulrunner-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/si
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libjavascript-perl_1.12-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu edbrowse_3.4.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu freej_0.10git20090824-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for xulrunner/libmozjs
transition"
The build should be done against xulrunner-dev and libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian R
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gxine_0.5.904-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers uns
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu elinks_0.12~pre5-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu couchdb_0.9.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers uns
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu bfilter_1.1.4+svn20090620-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libproxy_0.2.3-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for libmozjs transition"
The build should be done against libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.3-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers un
Hi,
Mozilla has released security updates for its 1.8 and 1.8.0 branches,
respectively 1.8.1.2 (for Firefox 2.0.0.2) and 1.8.0.10 (for Seamonkey
1.0.8, Thunderbird 1.5.0.10).
While on the 1.8 branch, the changes to nspr and nss might not be as
substancial, the changes to the 1.8.0 branch consiste
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
