On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 07:23:54PM +0100, Christoph Goehre wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:30:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to > > > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org. > > > > Speaking for the pkg-mozilla team, everything is more or less in shape, > > except the icedove transition that has not started yet: 3.0.x is > > expected to be the one shipped with squeeze, but it's still only in > > experimental. In any case, we don't want to ship 2.0.0.x in squeeze. > > OK, lets talk about icdove transition. With some help of Mike, I've > prepared the icedove-dev package for icedove 3.0. So it's time to move > icedove from experimental to sid, to be able to release it with squeeze. > We/I'll upload it to unstable until Groupwaremeeting[1] on 17th of > April. > > On the other hand, we have experimental free for versions of icedove > 3.1, which will hopefully released at 1st of June. Guido and I discuss > yesterday the fact, to get a beta/RC version of 3.1 in squeeze.
Please don't. Having more mozilla software in the release won't help with security support. > If Mozilla > be in time with its release plan, this would be a additional option. > Also in the face of EOL of 3.0 before ending of security support for > squeeze. 3.1 will also be EOL before the end of security support of squeeze. Going with 3.1 doesn't buy much time-wise. On the other hand, having only one codebase for the mozilla applications we ship (icedove, iceape, iceweasel) *will* help security support. That is why our target is respectively 3.0, 2.0 and 3.5. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100321074022.gb10...@glandium.org
