On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >>> Luk Claes wrote: > >>>> Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? > >>> I'll do that in the next days. > >> Ok, thanks! > > > > I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete binary > > packages (like iceape-browser) need to be removed by FTP masters? > > It's already removed by FTP masters, iceape just needs to migrate to > have any effect in testing (which won't happen before all reverse deps > are fixed).
What do you mean by that? Theorically, there is nothing to do to reverse dependencies. Keeping iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin ensures they can be built from source, but they shouldn't need rebuilding or any NMU. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
