x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>From 80b12e85cb7ff240fa0c31ebcd8bdb12bceb4c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi Dogguy
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:00:56 +0200
Subject: [PATC
built:
>
> gst-plugins-ugly0.10
> libav-extra
> libquicktime
> mplayer
> vlc
>
ben says that there is also: libquicktime and libav.
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/x264.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
gt; upgrade the severity of the blocking bugs.
>>
> After meta-gnome3 is in might work.
>
I thought we had ICU or OCaml next?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
on IRC by jcristau:
13:20 < jcristau> sgnb: in that case ocaml is probably ok to start. if
mehdi's ok with it.
13:24 * mehdi is ok
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
reopen 630201
thanks
On 11/01/2011 01:11 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> xz-utils | 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 | testing | source, amd64,
> armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel,
> powerpc, s390, sparc
>
oh, I forgot that liblzma2 is _still_ in testing (t
> the themes that are shipped in the package, I'd like to request a binNMU
> against
> fluxbox 1.3.2-1 on amd64. I've filed a bug against Fluxbox on the matter.
>
> nmu fluxbox_1.3.2-1 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild with correct vendor, see #647178.'
>
Schedule
On 11/20/2011 12:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:36 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>>> It seems that britney2 segfaults at every run when compiled for Python
>>> 2.6. After some quick inves
Hello,
I've prepared a patch (attached) which fixes a minor issue (#534516) for
postinst script of mldonkey but several users have already reported the
same issue.
Would it be accepted for the next point-release of lenny?
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~d
.
Maintainer scripts will be updated in next unstable versions.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~dogguy
Tel.: (+33).1.44.27.28.38
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ocamlgraph_1.2+debian-1 . ALL -m "rebuild with lablgtk2/2.14.0+dfsg-2"
TIA,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-re
On 0, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu ocamlgraph_1.2+debian-1 . ALL -m "rebuild with lablgtk2/2.14.0+dfsg-2"
I forgot the dep-wait line:
dw ocamlg
Hi,
Please unblock why/2.13-2. It removes a dependency and corrects two
important bugs.
Changelog:
* Using why-cpulimit instead of cpulimit Debian package, closes: #498485.
* Renaming 'dp' into 'why-dp', closes: #499140.
* Remove unnecessary dependency : cpulimit.
Thanks,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNS
h-ocaml-1.0.6/debian/changelog 2012-10-06 18:13:39.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+dh-ocaml (1.0.6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Sylvain Le Gall ]
+ * Remove Sylvain Le Gall from uploaders
+
+ [ Mehdi Dogguy ]
+ * dom-new-git-repo: Use KGB instead of CIA for new Git repositories.
+
+ -- Mehdi
Le 2013-01-06 11:08, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dh-ocaml
It seems I'll need a 1.0.7 /o\ to fix a typo. (Sorry, I should
have double checked before filing
retitle 697500 unblock: dh-ocaml/1.0.7
thanks
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
It seems I'll need a 1.0.7 /o\ to fix a typo. (Sorry, I should
have double checked before filing this unblock request).
New debdiff attached.
--
Mehdi
Base version: dh-ocaml_1.0.5 from testing
Target version: dh-ocaml_
vy
changes because of live-build. (I tend to think that it should be the
opposite but icbw). Can you elaborate please? Do you intend
to do heavy changes in syslinux as well?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
ght (2.2-15) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Sylvain Le Gall ]
+ * Remove Sylvain Le Gall from uploaders
+
+ [ Mehdi Dogguy ]
+ * Fix CVE-2012-3514 (Closes: #685584).
+- add 06_CVE-2012-3514.diff
+
+ -- Mehdi Dogguy Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:31:52 +0200
+
xml-light (2.2-14) unstable; urgency=low
issues.
Do you have in mind some very important fixes that you'd like to see
in Wheezy? If not, we'd prefer to keep 3.6.1-1 out of Wheezy.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50715857.5080...@dogguy.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2012 23:19, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>
> What is the release team's opinion on this?
>
First, we will need a debdiff between testing's version and the one you
want to upload, please.
Kind Regards,
- --
Mehdi Dogguy مه
hanged, 49485 insertions(+), 13745 deletions(-)
>
> [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678979
>
> [1]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/slony1-2.html
Kind regards,
- --
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/L
.1 which is currently in sid and contains the
> fix,
>
> - or me making an upload to t-p-u, with the attached patch?
>
I think the best way forwad would be to upload a targeted fix to t-p-u.
Please go ahead and thanks for your work!
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To
ty "normal" bug,
you uploaded a new upstream release [2] ?
[1] 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
[2] 232 files changed, 4897 insertions(+), 2082 deletions(-)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
in the long run for Debian stable.
>
I couldn't judge by looking at the diff because the top-directory in the
sources is versioned :/ Could you please provide a sensible diff between
the two version (patches applied)?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On 07/10/2012 16:25, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Mehdi Dogguy <mailto:me...@dogguy.org>> wrote:
>
> I couldn't judge by looking at the diff because the top-directory in
> the sources is versioned :/ Could you please provide a sensible diff
On 07/10/2012 17:27, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
>>>>>> Mehdi Dogguy writes:
>> It is a pity that the package didn't migrate due to a transient
>> build failure, but it is not an argument to unblock it. Besides,
>> the diff between testing's and si
On 07/10/2012 18:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> we delayed d-i wheezy beta 3 because of that nasty netcfg bug, and
> we had some buildd fun on powerpc; builds are here now, so please
> review & push it to wheezy ASAP.
>
Done.
Cheers.
--
Mehdi Dogg
seek
> conclusive advice on this matter, as to the prospects of
> unblocking the package and getting it into "testing".
>
Sorry for the delay.
I guess we could accept the changes made in the copyright file (as it
counts as a documentation fix), but we prefer to not have furth
On 13/09/2012 14:42, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 25/08/12 16:34, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> Hi Release Team,
>>
>> I plan to take over of python-eventlet . It has a FTBFS bug[1] in Wheezy
>> due to the bug in python-greenlet [2]. It is fixed, but not migrated to
&g
k okay. For the others, please show
minimal separate patches if you want to include them.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5072c660.1000...@dogguy.org
[ Martin's message didn't reach debian-release@ as, I guess, the
attachment was too big ]
On 07/10/2012 15:47, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2012-10-07 13:16, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> First, we will need a debdiff between testing's version and the one
>> you want to
e attached
> debdiff file.
>
> I shall await your response before uploading the new package.
>
Please go ahead with upload and notify us as soon as the package is
uploaded. I'll then add an unblock hint for the other two packages as well.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Doggu
go ahead with the upload. If you need to include
more than that, we will need a debdiff to answer.
Thanks for your work!
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50742ca1.6090...@dogguy.org
;unblock" bugreport against release.debian.org when icedove
is ready.
Thanks for your work,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi,
I recently uploaded Opam 1.2.0~rc4 (for the first time in Debian)
a few days ago. It should be able to migrate, in time before the
freeze, in testing.
A short time after my upload, upstream released 1.2.0. I expected
1.2.0~rc4 to be close to 1.2.0. It turns out that both are generated
from t
Hi,
Le 2014-10-25 15:17, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Hi,
I recently uploaded Opam 1.2.0~rc4 (for the first time in Debian)
a few days ago. It should be able to migrate, in time before the
freeze, in testing.
So, it migrated (as expected).
A short time after my upload, upstream released 1.2.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Le 2014-11-03 22:10, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 10:41 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Le 2014-10-25 15:17, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
A short time after my upload
On 19/07/12 15:23, Martin Pitt wrote:
8.4 was never meant to be in wheezy in the first place.
Should we remove it from testing then? (nothing depends on it afaict).
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
ed by Julien
see https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01153.html
We can't unblock pysvn yet since there are still non fixed reverse
dependencies (actually, there is only one… git-svn. See #678137).
We will re-check this request when git-svn is fixed.
Regards,
--
Mehdi D
Control: tag 683303 + confirmed
Sorry for the delay.
On 04/08/12 20:22, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
El Sábado, 4 de agosto de 2012, Julien Cristau escribió:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 18:31:39 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
[...]
Care to send a non-reversed debdiff? That makes it kinda painfu
On 03/09/12 11:18, Michael Vogt wrote:
I created a branch at
http://anonscm.debian.org/bzr/bzr/apt/python-apt/debian-wheezy/ that
is based on the debian-sid branch but disables auth.py. I am happy to
upload this to wheezy if that approach is approved by the release
team.
Putting this url
http:/
addition has never
migrated to testing due to build failures on archs which don't use
openjdk (kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386).
I see that bouncycastle/1.44+dfsg-3 was uploaded on Jul 10, 2011.
Why didn't it migrate?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
doesn't seem ready (which in
turn, is also blocked by gfs2-utils). I think the best way forward would
be to prepare an upload targeting testing-proposed-updates.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 18/08/12 17:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 16:24:52 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi,
As it seems, Daniel has uploaded a version of open-vm-tools that reverts
the contentious changes. This version has been in unstable for 11 days now
and no bugs have been reported since.
.46+dfsg-7
won't make it to Wheezy… unless you have very strong arguments.
I'm closing this bugreport. Please feel free to follow-up on #684963.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
(#686184) on
i386 addressed in -8.
So as far as Wheezy is concerned, the changes introduced in -7 to -9 are
a no-op, right? If so, why should we accept this package then? Not
touching it looks like the best option we have :)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To
On 31/08/12 09:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:22:49 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload libnss3 3.13.6, with an additional change to make
the binary compressed with xz (bug 683835).
[...]
Any objection?
Go ahead.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi
2.3.2-9+deb7u1 version to tpu. The attached debdiff excludes the po
directory.
Sorry for the delay. The diff looks okay. Please go ahead.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
d to t-p-u. Please go ahead.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5051ce78.4070...@dogguy.org
success yet. As he is MIA for two hundred days, I plan to do an
NMU targeting wheezy-proposed-updates.
Would the Release Team let me to do this? The debdiff is attached.
The debdiff looks okay, but what about #650293?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
ebian-release can say about this, tbh. At least,
these days, we don't mind if buildds are a bit busy (especially if it is
for experimental since it has lower priority than when building for sid).
HTH,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
Le 2015-02-02 11:34, Russell Sim a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgit2
The newer version of the libgit2 package fixes a security hole [0].
Sorry I real
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
Le 2015-01-28 21:43, Mathieu Parent a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I just want to make sure I could upload a new CTDB to sid...
I prepared (see attached patch and [git]) a new
Control: retitle -1 unblock-udeb syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5
Le 2015-01-19 19:46, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5.
Unblocked, but needs an unblock-udeb to be
Le 2015-01-28 01:59, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit :
Dear Release Managers,
Snort and Daq where removed from testing on December 7th following an
upload
to the daq library which did not follow the freeze policy.
Currently, both Snort (2.9.7.0-4) and daq (2.0.4-3) have been
available
Control: retitle -1 unblock-udeb: brltty/5.2~20141018-3
Le 2015-02-08 23:28, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Please unblock package brltty
Unblocked, but needs an unblock-udeb to migrate to Jessie. (CC'ing KiBi
and retitling the bug accordingly).
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Le 2015-01-11 13:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
As pointed out earlier this thread, it might be more wise to apply the
fix to simpleburn_1.7.0-2 from unstable as well as it turns out that
the
previously applied patch is not a 100% correct, isn't it?
My suggestion would be to upload a
Tags: + confirmed
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:49:34PM +1100, Russell Sim
wrote:
> On 11 February 2015 at 23:24, Russell Sim wrote:
>
> > On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >
> >> I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the chang
Control: retitle -1 pre-approval: node-findit2/2.2.3-2
Le 2015-02-16 20:33, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-findit2
The package build-depends on node-tap, a buggy pac
Tags: + confirmed
Le 2015-02-16 20:14, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
The package had a security vulnerability which was the bug that caused
node-serve-static and its reverse dependencies to be marked as
autoremove. This debdiff fixes that vulnerability without touching any
other code.
diff -Nru node
Tags: confirmed
Le 2015-02-14 00:25, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Moritz Mühlenhoff (aka jmm) made me aware of CVE-2014-7231, which has
been
fixed in the release 0.2.0 of python-oslo.utils. This version has
never been
uploaded to Sid (I uploaded it to Experimental instead), as I didn't
want to
ri
Tags: confirmed
Le 2015-02-13 13:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
In order to fix bug 777622, I prepared a repacked tar ball and the
attached
changes to the packaging of Lazarus. I completely stripped the
lcl/interfaces/carbon directory from the tar ball, which could be done
safely because it is not
n QA Group (see #713004).
> + * Add conflicts between rdnssd and network-manager (closes: #740998).
> +
> + -- Michael Gilbert Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:16:37 +
Wouldn't that break the installer? ... since netcfg is installing rdnssd
and network-manager is being installed by defaul
rity to grave only to have out attention?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150217155715.gd17...@dogguy.org
Le 2015-02-10 11:05, Simon McVittie a écrit :
Control: retitle 776144 unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 at 21:47:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
While I'm waiting for the d-i ack anyway, I've uploaded dbus/1.8.14-2
to
avoid the bad dbus/systemd trigger interactions in upgrades
... a
Le 2015-02-16 23:09, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
* Julien Cristau:
1. Override upstream's decision to change the SONAME with every
release.
I am not entirelysure how stable libhtp's API/ABI should be
considered -- looking at changes and deciding on compatibility
issues
making those decisi
Hi,
Le 2015-02-17 19:06, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
There is an incompatibility with Perl 5.18, which can be fixed by the
patch
added in 3:3.0.6-8. The bug itself has been reported with severity
important.
However the reporter speaks about "errors".
Is this relevant for Perl >=5.18, or 5.18
Hi all,
Le 2015-01-16 23:37, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Please unblock package tbb
It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
So
Hi,
Le 2015-02-17 17:52, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
no, the severity was set by the bug submitter IIRC.
I recently downgraded the severity to important to avoid removal from
testing and because of the malformed command line the bug submitter
used.
Nonetheless, segfaults should not happen and the
Tags: moreinfo
Hi,
Le 2015-02-13 11:24, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
+ * Fix oar-node pid file location (Closes: #772564)
Accepted.
+ * Fix errors with the TRUNCATE SQL request which is incompatible
with MySQL
+and causes deadlocks with PostgreSQL (Closes: #773790)
Accepted.
+ * F
From the diff, I see that there might be a missing dependency on
bind9, cache directory not writable, default keytab file non-existent.
There are other changes but didn't read them carefully, tbh.
The changelog also seems in contradiction with the scripts since :
+ * rules, postinst: Create /va
Le 2015-02-17 23:46, Brian May a écrit :
On 18 February 2015 at 07:31, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Note that this not mean that we will accept (let's say) 1.7.5 next
time.
I assume you mean that when 1.7.5 comes out, we should make another
unblock request?
Yes. The idea is to not assume that
Le 2014-12-03 13:13, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:16:57AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
% ssh coccia.debian.org dak ls bareos
bareos | 14.2.1+20141017gitc6c5b56-4 | accepted| source,
amd64
bareos | 14.2.1+20141017gitc6c5b56-4 |
Le 2015-02-18 00:35, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Le 2014-12-10 16:19, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2014-12-10 14:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
Please unblock package netplug
New version of netplug package (1.2.9.2-2) which is on
http://mentors.debian.org/package/netplug fix more
Le 2015-02-18 09:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
And if you don't agree, then I would be interested to know what could
bring you the required confidence so that we can gain that status
(maybe adding autopkgtests to reverse dependencies and running
those tests, or stuff like that).
The list of p
ne, we will be able to unblock tbb.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150218190121.gd1...@dogguy.org
h the introduced changes to remove DRMAA support.
Also, I wonder if it is a good time to remove gridengine at all. It is
not like it needed many updates in stable or oldstable to worry about it.
My preference would be to keep gridengine and not bother ourselves.
Any other opinions from the team?
R
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker
wrote:
>
> Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
>
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois
wrote:
> Mehdi Dogguy (2015-02-18):
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
> > >
> >
Tags: + d-i
Le 2015-02-19 06:30, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Wouldn't that break the installer? ... since netcfg is installing
rdnssd
and network-manager is being installed by default.
I don't see why it would. Yes, rdnssd-ud
Le 2015-02-19 07:50, olivier sallou a écrit :
b) It was not part of past stable releases.
As it did not exist before, it could not be in previous stable
releases
Please understand that this is an important bit of information for us
since
it means that there are no stable users that wil
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
Le 2015-02-18 23:00, Pierre Neyron a écrit :
Hi Mehdi,
To me, this bug is critical, because it makes the use of the moldable
jobs feature break the advance reservation feature, and both features
are important to users of OAR.
Thanks for the detailed ex
Control: tags -1 + pending
Le 2015-02-19 13:53, Timo Aaltonen a écrit :
On 18.02.2015 01:06, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
From the diff, I see that there might be a missing dependency on
bind9, cache directory not writable, default keytab file
non-existent.
There are other changes but didn't
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:22:24PM -0500, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
>
> Please consider unblocking bind9. It fixes a new security issue.
>
> unblock bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9
> unblock-udeb bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9
Unblocked, but needs a d-i ack.
Regards,
-
tatus here please?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150219192632.gf23...@dogguy.org
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
wrote:
>
> If you prefer, I can do another upload with the junk removed. Either
> way works for me.
>
That would be nice, yes. And will saves us time during the
review. Thanks.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:25:16PM +0100, Christoph Berg
wrote:
> Re: Mehdi Dogguy 2015-02-22 <20150222174611.gb14...@dogguy.org>
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Christoph Berg
> > wrote:
> > > +
> > > +-\set ECHO all;
> > > ++\set
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:26:07PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Please approve the upload for python-pip 1.5.6-5 which fixes the severity
> serious bug #744145
>
Unblocked. Please file an unblock bug report next time.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + d-i - moreinfo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:24:20PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Ve
x27;s done, we add the
necessary hint. We follow this process for every package with udebs.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://list
5-10
>
Unfortunately, unblocking llvm-toolchain-3.5 requires fixing #777580.
Feel free to remove the moreinfo tag when the RC bug is fixed.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Le 2014-12-12 16:52, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dose3
Did you also request binNMUs for reverse dependencies?
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
ease of version 6 of the Debian operating system"
> seems a bit cleaner/professional than the same statement with 6.0
> instead of 6.
>
You forgot the argument about “stability”, which is as pertinent as
“professional” and “clean”, imho.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http:
On 14/09/2010 22:14, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 05:56 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Besides, Giuseppe said that Chromium 5.x wasn't an option for Squeeze
>> and uploaded Chromium 6.x. Why this won't happen again during the
>> freeze? or worst, during Sque
sh/2.2.9-7~squeeze1
>
s/unblock/approve/
> Regards,
> Micha
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9129c5.8020...@debian.org
On 16/09/2010 07:56, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Hi, release team!
>
> Iceweasel 3.5.12 has gone to squeeze, so I think that its
> localization should be there, too.
>
Done.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On 16/09/2010 18:40, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> Please unblock sisu 2.6.3-5, which contains a bug fix #596736 for Squeeze.
>
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
ges (if you upload). When #595054 is fixed,
you'll be able to request another freeze exception (and would be simpler
for us to review since it will a one-fix-release).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@list
an-devel suggesting that uploading to this would solve the issue.
>
Philipp approved the tpu upload.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c936400.8070...@debian.org
? Thank you for considering.
>
Having the complete diff would certainly help to decide. Would you mind
giving such diff please?
(P.S.: You can upload it to experimental if you want)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lis
On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
>
> Would you grant a freeze exception for this package after it spends
> some time in unstable? Thank you for considering.
>
Yes.
(P.S.: answer for kdepim is coming… once I find some time for it or
someone beat me to it).
Regards
301 - 400 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
