Sorry for the delay, I'm happy to prepare a p-u upload this weekend.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libp11-openssl1.1
This is a new package which is adds only pkcs11 engine support for openssl 1.1.
Without this the change it can't be used with openssl 1.1 only with
cvs.cgi/branches/STABLE-BRANCH-1-4/g10/keyring.c?root=GnuPG&rev=4993&r1=4963&r2=4993
> (gnupg 1.4)
> http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/g10/keyring.c?root=GnuPG&rev=4994&r1=4980&r2=4994
> (gnupg2)
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
I didn't s
certainly.
>
> Hopefully these updates won't have the problem of past mozilla
> new-upstream-version "security" fixes, where every single file shows up in
> the diff because of cvs keywords?
I don't think every single file will, but yes, there are a bunch of
th that
> work, so that we can get a releasable version of iceweasel into
> testing soon. If time allows, you can propose a new packages with
> reorganized/added patches at a later point, but right now, I would like
> to get big pieces like iceweasel finally ready for release.
I'll
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:05:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Bro
rk with emacs22. I'm a heavy user of this so tested
very well. Low risk.
sqlfairy 0.07-4 -> 0.07-5
Small fix for some broken argument variables. Very low risk.
And FYI there will probably be new security fix upstream releases for
gnupg2 and iceweasel within the week.
--
Eric Dorland <
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> > that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
> > the next release.
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > I have a few minor fixes in packa
ut to check for phising. Has anyone actually observed this?
PS thanks for all the great work on xulrunner.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ian-release@ to get the new version into
> lenny. Is it just forgoten, because I cannot find one on the lists.
>
> Thank you.
>
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Although not reported as a bug, openct 0.6.2 (the version in testing)
needed a soname bump but didn't get it. 0.6.4 fixes that problem, and
since opensc and openct are somewhat codependent, the latest version
of it should go in as well.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:23:36AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Although not reported as a bug, openct 0.6.2 (the version in testing)
> > needed a soname bump but didn't get it. 0.6.4 fixes that problem, and
&
Alright, after a false start with 1.0.4-1, -2 has finished building on
m68k and is ready for inclusion in testing. 1.0.4 is security
fix release, no new features.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0
bug
> against ftp.d.o for removal, and it'll be removed. That's the best way
> to do it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-
nd on the version of binutils in
unstable. I thought the testing scripts did not consider the
build-depends, but if they do that could pose a problem as well.
Could any release/ftp-masters take care of the first issue, and
someone enlighten me to the second. Thanks.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL P
a version in
unstable, so it's probably quite safe to remove.
Thanks gentlemen. (and ladies).
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:37:53PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > If you take a look at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Ok, looking again at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mozilla-firefox there
> > seems to be a few more issues.
>
> > It appears that mo
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 00:32 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Sorry Jonathan, due to some personal commitments and the flu I haven't
> > gotten to this yet. But I'll prepare these by the end of the week.
>
> It ap
Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog
--- automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog 2010-02-22 00:31:55.0 -0500
+++ automake1.10-1.10.3/debian
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
--- automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
+++ automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
@@ -408,7 +408,8
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
>
> This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
>
> +automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
Proposed stable update for automake1.7.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
--- automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
+++ automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+automake1.7 (1.7.9-9.1
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> not sure you got that mail (at least M-F-T said you didn't want a copy):
>
> Adam D. Barratt (31/07/2012):
> > On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.
ow to reproduce it, could you please try to do so with 2.0.14-2
> and confirm whether it's already been fixed?
>
> Relatedly, the BTS still thinks #567926 affects 2.0.14-2 (because the
> changelog
> for that version neither includes the NMU entry nor re-closes the bug),
Hello,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=firefox
firefox is ready to go into testing, except it's blocking on a bunch
of translation packages that have been updated and renamed themselves
already for the most part.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi
>
> > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=firefox
> > firefox is ready to go into testing, except it's blocking on a bunch
> > of translation pa
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >>Eric Dorland wrote:
> [...]
> >>I've uploaded a fixed package of mozilla-firefox-locale-all yesterday...
> >> Apparantly all the d
>
clanlib
Klaus Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sqlxx
strutilsxx
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
toshutils
Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fkiss
Riccardo Setti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libgalago
Thomas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fuzz
Ch
* Artur R. Czechowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:11:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > automake1.4: This is the old school package, that's been completely
> > unsupported for a number of years (since 2002). It certainly not used
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debian[0].
> >
> > [0] Their plan, whi
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnan
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Eric Dorland wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey
<[EM
w version late tonight at the
latest.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it wouldn't be the end of the world. I'm actually
more worried about getting ride of automake1.7 for this release
(http://bugs.debian.org/648591, since I have your attention).
I'll still be able to upload new versions of automake 1.11 if this
upload is rejected right?
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The -dev
package is missing a dependency that makes building against the
library impossible. The changelog could have been clearer and I could
have filed a bug, but I was lazy. Can you please remove the urgency
override?
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
so please unblock these packages.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rsion
of automake might be a better bet. If people don't like this current
scheme we can discuss if the current scheme is a bad idea.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> This one is calling autoreconf in debian/rules w/o --install (or
> --force), and as such will miss needed scripts at build time.
>
>
> I don't see any problem with automake here, just upstream or packaging
> problems.
Thanks for the analysis Guillem.
--
Eric Dorland
IC
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> >
41 matches
Mail list logo
