On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> [...]
>
> TIA
>
> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
>
> [...]
Hi,
There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stallin
On 2012-12-02 13:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
>> diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
>> --- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
>> +++ aephea-10.008/debian/contro
On 2012-12-08 17:10, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package python-mock
>
> This upload resolved RC bug #694296, "python-mock-doc: missing
> Breaks+Replaces: pyt
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:15:25 +0100
with message-id <50c464bd.5030...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#695488: unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #695488,
regarding unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Dear release team,
I prepared a new revision on gnunet and uploaded it to mentors.
You'll find attached the full debdiff to the last unblocked revision
(0.9.3-3). Here is the detail of the changes, with the answers to Julien:
Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> + * Revert the use d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 689154 unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1
Bug #689154 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1' from 'unblock:
gnunet/0.9.3-4'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am a bit concerned about the suid drop from an upgrade PoV. I would
> expect a NEWS entry or so to inform people of the change just in case
> they were relying on the suid.
Possibly.
> Alternatively if the code-base is as dead
Dear release team managers,
by now the minimal version of the package libpam-ssh has been uploaded since 21
days,
and an upstream version of the package meant for the experimental distribution
is currently
investigated by the sponsor.
As reported in #685614 and #664177, libpam-ssh is important
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload
> to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also
> need a tpu due to the libunwind8 mess. :-( For added fun, the package is
> in sync bet
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload
> > to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also
> > need a tpu due to t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #694452 [release.debian.org] unblock: gjs/1.32.0-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
694452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694452
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-11-26 15:31, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package gjs for an API extension that is necessary for a
> RC bugfix in gnome-documents.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 691988 unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Bug #691988 [release.debian.org] pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15' from 'pre-approve unblock:
libpam-ssh/1.92-15'
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Niels Thykier (24/11/2012):
> Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval.
d-i ack. Sorry for the lag…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Niels Thykier (24/11/2012):
> Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval.
Interesting output in 'd'…
Anyway, d-i ack, with apologies for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:29 +0100
with message-id <50c482fd.7070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#694109: Make that kfreebsd-9_9.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #694109,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:44 +0100
with message-id <50c4830c.6010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#694108: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694108,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Adam D. Barratt (29/11/2012):
> Unblocked, but needs the predictable d-i ack; thanks.
d-i ack, sorry for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Adam D. Barratt (01/12/2012):
> Unblocked; thanks. Needs a d-i ack, so CCing KiBi.
d-i ack, and sorry for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Julien,
Am 26.11.2012 13:35, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:26:28 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> On 11/25/2012 09:41 PM CEST +02:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:52 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
This release fixes Debian bug #688831, s
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:08:44 +0100
with message-id <20121209140844.gs5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694094,
regarding unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Hi,
I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it?
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/694052
This is the patch:
-Conflicts: magpierss (<= 0.72-5)
-Replaces: magpierss (<= 0.72-5)
+Conflicts: magpierss (<< 0.72-6)
+Replaces: magpierss (<< 0.72-6)
Cheers,
--
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp:me..
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió:
> > Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place?
>
> libqt4-dbus used to ship both the library and qdbus, an application. As part
> of
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 23:05:06 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > +@@ -97,39 +85,27 @@ static inline void tio_tv_prepare(struct
> > + deadline->tv_usec=0;
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:21:26 +0100
with message-id <20121209152126.gu5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691640: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #691640,
regarding unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sun 09 Dec 2012 11:59:22 Julien Cristau escribió:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió:
> > > Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place?
> >
> > libqt4-dbus used to
On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 13:11, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Thank you Dominic for keeping updated. Security team, attached is the
>> > proposed debdiff for the libcgi-pm-perl part.
>>
>> Yes, please upload this to security master.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
for what it's worth, I'm currently acting as a sponsor for Jérôme. He
seems clearly interested in maintaining this package on the long run.
I am currently reviewing an upload targeted at experimental which is
of good quality.
Kind regards, Thib
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:03 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I did a grave mistake and the upload landed on ftp-master. Shortly
> > after I noticed my mistake I tried to cancel but it was to late, and
> > it's now on stable-new.
[...]
>
On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> [...]
>> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
> [...]
> There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to
> testing. Could you please have a look at it and look at solving it
> (ev
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:20:07 +
with message-id <1355070007.19225.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694826,
regarding unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:22:34 +
with message-id <1355070154.19225.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694745: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #694745,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
to be marked as done.
T
Processing changes file: libcgi-pm-perl_3.49-1squeeze2_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1thjyu-00061o...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695174 - moreinfo
Bug #695174 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 16:57 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote:
> I have fixed the postinst permission issue, the postrm aolserver call
> and now the local config modifications are authoritative and debconf
> values are overwritten with them at the beginning of the config script.
>
> debdiff between tes
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icew
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package guile-g-wrap
I just applied the patch of #694272 which seemed straightforward and
uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I
assume the packag
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gri
I just applied the patch of #694275 which seemed straightforward and
uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I
assume the package is fine
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 681016 + confirmed
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
681016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 681016 tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
Changed Bug title to 'tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3' from 'unblock:
dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2'
>
End of message, stopping p
Hi Scott,
First, a disclaimer: I'm not a python expert or a member of the
release team, so please take anything I say with a grain of salt.
This review is mostly meant to help get this unstuck.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> - Match the version number for python and python2.7.3. Although this is
>
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:59:26 +
with message-id <1355086766.19225.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695521: unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695521,
regarding unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
>> [...]
>> There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to
>> testing. Could you please have a loo
[Jonathan Nieder, 2012-12-09]
> [...]
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/pyversions.py 2012-06-05
> > 22:58:56.0 -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/pyversions.py 2012-07-26
> > 18:26:10.0 -0400
> > @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@
> > else:
> > return _unsuppo
(Release team: please see the end of this message in particular...)
intrigeri writes:
> I removed a bit of the dust accumulated on my elisp skills and
> reviewed the proposed changes. They look sane.
> (Disclaimer: I'm not a release team member.)
>
> I've tested the proposed patch with emacs24
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:51 -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it?
[...]
> -Conflicts: magpierss (<= 0.72-5)
> -Replaces: magpierss (<= 0.72-5)
> +Conflicts: magpierss (<< 0.72-6)
> +Replaces: magpierss (<< 0.72-6)
That sounds okay, but please
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:23:10AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > Please unblock package schroot
> >
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:13:49 +0100
with message-id <50c58bad.6070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#695520: unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695520,
regarding unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
49 matches
Mail list logo
