Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
>> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
>> august for the appropriate builds.
>
> out
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Hi,
the package emacs22-non-dfsg in non-free should be removed from squeeze,
because it is just GFDL material splitted from emacs22 package, which
has been removed also from squeeze (so it would
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 23:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 23:00:47 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 21:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 21:22 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > > I am not really sure what to do. I f
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.8lenny8_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.37lenny8_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.37lenny8_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-arm-
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 09:32:24 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> No, it means that coinor-cbc needs to be unblocked to be able to enter
> testing when atlas does. Your sentence is a bit cryptic to me - do you
> want me to drop the dependency on atlas?
>
No, I want atlas fixed. atlas won't ente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 04:23 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I advocate for the acceptance of python-poker-network-1.7.7-2[1]
>> into
>
>
> poker-network.
>
>> Squeeze because:
>>
>> * init script in 1.7.7-1.1 now
On 09/08/2010 10:50 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
> I have just uploaded 1.7.7-3 which adds the translation files that
> were accidentaly removed in 1.7.7-2
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:44:02 +0200
with message-id <4c875ae2.3030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#596039: RM: emacs22-non-dfsg/22.3+1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596039,
regarding RM: emacs22-non-dfsg/22.3+1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:55:31 +0200
with message-id <4c875d93.8040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#596016: unblock: intel-microcode/0.20100826-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596016,
regarding unblock: intel-microcode/0.20100826-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
On 09/08/2010 06:02 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> […]
>
Please, get your propaganda out of here. I understand why he was
pissed off.
>
> As this upload includes a security fix, I would be great if it was
> given a higher priority by the release team (btw, I've set
> urgency=high).
>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:02:02PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I took over maintainership of libnusoap-php after the current maintainer
> loosely sent an RFA in the middle of the freeze only few months after he
> had his packages in the archive, because he was pissed by the discussion
> in #5953
Hi all,
Sorry for a very late reply on this one.
> Marc,
>
> On 08/16/2010 10:56 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
> >Please unblock clamav-data as this will bring more virus signatures
> >into lenny. The package is built and tested automatically inside the
> >debian-volatile infrastructure.
>
> well, it's
Sorry, debian-rele...@bugs.d.o really doesn't exist...
> Hi all,
>
> (Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
>
> > The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> > hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
> >
> > The issue see
Hi all,
(Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
> The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
>
> The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to the
> upstream maint
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:02:02PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[…]
> That leads me to say that I would suggest any DD
> to *not* sponsor any package from Olivier Berger in the future, as he
> really had a bad attitude on this case.
I would like to kindly ask you to take it down a notc
I've uploaded djvulibre 3.5.23-1 and am hoping to have it allowed to
migrate into testing. Reason: the substantive changes from the
current version in testing are almost entirely bug fixes, including
two rather nasty ones.
One of these bugs (562156) causes incorrect PDF to be generated in
some lo
I've been following the chromium-browser saga a bit, who has ended up
with the removal of the package from testing [1,2]. While I'm a
chromium-browser user myself, and hence I'm saddened of seeing it go,
I'm not here to question the choice as I'm sure it's been made as the
right one and that it has
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:54:45PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-06]
> > So upstream have verified the result of 2to3 on their software?
>
> yes
>
> > On a related note, will the build system allow for the result of 2to3 to
> > be easily overridden? For example, if wh
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Well, it was the case during lenny's freeze because (if I'm not
> > mistaken) the packages were still brand new at that time, which doesn't
> > apply anymore.
>
> this is not what luk said to me last release cycle.
>
> > Besides, I don'
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Please unblock the package pacemaker-mgmt. Right now, it is not present
in Squeeze at all. The tool included in this package, which is called
"hb_gui",
used
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [3] A question you might have at this point is: "why you bother about
> Chromium and not other packages?". Well, I do bother about all
> packages and I'm just trying to anticipate questions I'll might be
> asked as so
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> > Well, it was the case during lenny's freeze because (if I'm not
>> > mistaken) the packages were still brand new at that time, which doesn't
>> > apply anymore.
>>
>> th
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > [3] A question you might have at this point is: "why you bother about
> > Chromium and not other packages?". Well, I do bother about all
> > packages and I'
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 13:48:49 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've been following the chromium-browser saga a bit, who has ended up
> with the removal of the package from testing [1,2]. While I'm a
> chromium-browser user myself, and hence I'm saddened of seeing it go,
> I'm not here to ques
[Neil McGovern, 2010-09-08]
> I'm slightly worried by:
> Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
> changed, but 2to3 cannot fix automatically. In this case, 2to3 will
> print a warning beneath the diff for a file. You should address the
> warning in order to have compl
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > people (including me) can't really do wide tests of images that can't be
> > build in the first place if not all tasks are installable. that's why
> > some bugs only turn up quite late in the release cycle.
> a few packages are in t
On 08/09/2010 00:14, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> if you judge bugs only by it's reported severity, i can upgrade it to
> serious :)
>
I won't play that game. It's just useless.
>>
>> Why asking for an unblock if there are still changes to be
>> uploaded/worked on?
>
> because i was told that
On 09/08/2010 03:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't have any reason to
> believe the new version won't have the same problem 2 months (or a year)
> from now
Note that this isn't a chromium specific issue, please see the opened
issues in webkit:
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/sourc
On 09/08/2010 03:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> and as far as I know neither the security team nor the stable
> release managers usually accept that kind of changes in stable. If they
> say they'll be happy to accept random chromium code dumps in released
> squeeze, then I guess we can let it back
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:02:02PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I took over maintainership of libnusoap-php after the current maintainer
>> loosely sent an RFA in the middle of the freeze only few months after he
>> had his packages in the archive, because he was pissed by
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Please, get your propaganda out of here. I understand why he was
> pissed off.
I quite feel sorry about the issue too, and maybe even a bit guilty.
I'll try my best to ask things in a better way next time, trying to
avoid sensitivity of maintainers.
I tried everything, and h
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:48:49 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've been following the chromium-browser saga a bit, who has ended up
> with the removal of the package from testing [1,2]. While I'm a
> chromium-browser user myself, and hence I'm saddened of seeing it go,
> I'm not here to question t
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:58:17 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 03:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I don't have any reason to
> > believe the new version won't have the same problem 2 months (or a year)
> > from now
>
> Note that this isn't a chromium specific issue, please see the o
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > a few packages are in this boat: debian-cd, live-* packages, debian-edu,
> > fai and probably others.
> fai? Ew, I don't think so.
then I suggest you do your homework and read past years archives.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
On 09/08/2010 04:15 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> That isn't a very good list wrt to squeeze's webkit since that includes
> the multitude of lenny issues.
That was the point, the number of webkit opened issues in lenny.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:23:59 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 04:15 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > That isn't a very good list wrt to squeeze's webkit since that includes
> > the multitude of lenny issues.
>
> That was the point, the number of webkit opened issues in lenny.
That is
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:11:42PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I have no idea whether you have already come to a conclusion regarding
> clamav-data.
We have. Clamav-data is dead, the host that was building it retired
and decommissioned, all monitoring jobs disabled, a lot of work
flushed do
On 08/09/2010 15:50, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I tried everything, and he didn't want to listen to any of my points.
> He wouldn't even trust what PHP displayed to him on the screen.
How this sentence is supposed to enhance the situation? Can't you just stop?
> Just give-up and do an NMU? I thi
On 2010-09-08 16:10 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:48:49 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> I've been following the chromium-browser saga a bit, who has ended up
>> with the removal of the package from testing [1,2]. While I'm a
>> chromium-browser user myself, and hence I'
On 09/08/2010 04:26 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> That isn't really a fair comparison. I campaigned (unsuccessfully) to
> keep webkit out of lenny at the time since it was so
> experimental/unsupportable. Thus I had no interest in supporting
> that. However, I'm planning to help support webkit in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock libcrypt-openssl-x509-perl/1.4-1. It fixes a segfault in
the fingerprint_sha1 method[1] and a bug that causes new_from_string to
fail for some certificates[2].
unblock lib
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:55:40 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-09-08 16:10 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:48:49 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >> I've been following the chromium-browser saga a bit, who has ended up
> >> with the removal of the package from testin
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:02:33 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 04:26 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > That isn't really a fair comparison. I campaigned (unsuccessfully) to
> > keep webkit out of lenny at the time since it was so
> > experimental/unsupportable. Thus I had no interest i
On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
What was changed from lenny to now?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-09-08 16:10 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I think that this need is justification to declare backports "officially
>> supported by the debian project". Thus when asked this question, you
>> can point to the fact that chromium is ind
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:09:32 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
>
> What was changed from lenny to now?
The are now many very usable webkit frontends, which I can use on a
daily basis, so I now
/me likes to apologize for the style in my previous mail again.
that said...
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> then I suggest you do your homework and read past years archives.
phil, i can see [requests for unblocking of] 3.2.16 in 2009, 3.2.15,
.14 and .11 in 2008, 4 more
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 17:09 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano a écrit :
> On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
>
> What was changed from lenny to now?
What has changed is that webkit is widely deployed inside and outside
Debian,
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I think that this need is justification to declare backports "officially
> supported by the debian project". Thus when asked this question, you
> can point to the fact that chromium is indeed supported on stable, just
> via a different model than folks are used to.
Do you
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:17:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 17:09 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano a écrit :
> > On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
> >
> > What was changed from lenny to now?
>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [2] Chromium or iceweasel; take your pick since backports is being
> suggested as a delivery mechanism for both.
There is a difference with Iceweasel, though, in that squeeze will ship
with Iceweasel.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:14:33 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I think that this need is justification to declare backports "officially
> > supported by the debian project". Thus when asked this question, you
> > can point to the fact that chromium is indeed supported on stable,
On 09/08/2010 05:15 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I now have interest in using webkit itself, and thus
> have interest in closing security issues; whereas with lenny there is
> no usable frontend, and thus no reason for anyone to be interested in
> security support.
I think it is more honest to say
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:42:37 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 05:15 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I now have interest in using webkit itself, and thus
> > have interest in closing security issues; whereas with lenny there is
> > no usable frontend, and thus no reason for anyone to b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
brasero (2.30.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Recommend cdrdao 1.2.3 so that it can actually work.
+ This restores CD copying functionality. Closes: #587408.
+ And audi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock dmz-cursor-theme for squeeze.
dmz-cursor-theme (0.4.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Standards version is 3.9.1.
* Update to latest git version.
* Update copyr
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
> lot of this concern.
Unless it installs the package from backports, the most the installer
can do is eliminate one or two of the three or four things users must
do to use it. All my comments about user
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock epiphany-extensions for squeeze.
epiphany-extensions (2.30.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Josselin Mouette ]
* Drop obsolete dependencies on w3c-dtd-xhtml and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock gdm for squeeze.
gdm (2.20.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Use linux-any wildcard instead of listing non-linux architectures.
* Bump standards version accordi
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:19:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
> > lot of this concern.
>
> Unless it installs the package from backports, the most the installer
> can do is eliminate one or two of the th
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:19:40 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
> > lot of this concern.
>
> Unless it installs the package from backports, the most the installer
> can do is eliminate one or two of the three or
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:22:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> from now, and as far as I know neither the security team nor the stable
> release managers usually accept that kind of changes in stable. If they
> say they'll be happy to accept random chromium code dumps in released
> squeeze,
Greetings! I uploaded a fix for 591862 together with a minor upstream
point release that just missed the freeze. Would it be possible to
permit the fixed version in unstable to migrate, or should a patch to
the testing version be prepared? In case of the latter, I cannot
upload such to unstable
found 591839 2.7.STABLE3-4.1lenny1
found 591839 2.7.STABLE9-2
thanks
Hi Luigi,
do you plan to address 591839 before the release of squeeze?
Hi release-team,
would an NMU with the following patch to squid.conf be acceptable?
-refresh_pattern (Release|Package(.gz)*)$ 0 20% 2880
+
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:36:41PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! I uploaded a fix for 591862 together with a minor upstream
> point release that just missed the freeze. Would it be possible to
> permit the fixed version in unstable to migrate, or should a patch to
> the testing ver
Hi,
please unblock knowledgeroot 0.9.9.5-5.
It fixes Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HTML Purifier
[CVE-2010-2479] .
regards,
Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:11AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Maxima has an RC bug in squeeze (#591862). Unfortunately, the fix for
> that bug was made along with a new upstream release. I have just made
> a request to the maintainer to handle this issue[1]. However, in t
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:57:28 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:19:40 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
> > > lot of this concern.
> >
> > Unless it installs the package from backports, th
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 14:15:26 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> As for the need for pinning, that can be solved by judiciously choosing
> package names. The current instructions say to append '~bpo' to all
> packages, which makes backport versions older than stable versions. For
> chromium and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock gtksourceview2 for squeeze.
gtksourceview2 (2.10.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream bugfix and documentation release.
The upstream changes are only bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 593943
Bug #593943 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [release.debian.org]
unblock: python-virtualenv/1.4.9-3
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
593943: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:30:21 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 14:15:26 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > As for the need for pinning, that can be solved by judiciously choosing
> > package names. The current instructions say to append '~bpo' to all
> > packages, which makes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gvfs for squeeze, it is only a trivial RC bug fix.
gvfs (1.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Depend on fuse-utils 2.8.4. Closes: #585648.
Cheers,
--
.''`.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock libwnck for squeeze.
libwnck (2.30.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ]
* debian/control.in:
- Standards-Version is 3.9.0, no cha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 593943
Bug#593943: unblock: python-virtualenv/1.4.9-3
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Piotr Ożarowski
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
block 596122 by 590274
thanks
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 20:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> please unblock gvfs for squeeze, it is only a trivial RC bug fix.
>
> gvfs (1.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Depend on fuse-utils 2.8.4. Closes: #585648.
While the gvfs fix is indeed trivial, fus
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 596122 by 590274
Bug #596122 [release.debian.org] unblock: gvfs/1.6.3-2
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 596122: 590274
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
596122: http://bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
mpg123 1.12.1-3 fixes a problem playing mp3 streams from the web, leading to
choppy or corrupted output. No Debian bug was filed, but I consider the fix
important enough to make it into the next stable release. The patch is taken
from upstream vers
Hi.
I just found a grave bug in darcs-monitor (#596127), which makes it unusable
for everyone. It's a simple issue, the patch is attached. I've made an upload
of the 0.3.8-2 version to sid. Can you please unblock it?
Thanks.
--
marcot
http://marcot.eti.br/
darcs-monitor_0.3.8-2.patch
Descri
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.
This is possibly the simplest possible Debian package: it
installs precicely one upstream file, plus the changelog
and copyright files. A
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
the build of ia32-libs for ia64 on the recent upload was broken and the
dependencies of the package are wrong. This was a problem of the build
environment and it should work fine on the
Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.2.5-1+lenny5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1otqom-0004af...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
I'm requiring an freeze exception to get the new python-tornado package
currently in Sid into Squeeze. It would allow the "bup" package to get
rid of a embedded python-tornado library and to depend on the new
python-tornado package, which is a cleaner situation. It's not currently
possible tha
retitle 595779 unblock: cvsd/1.0.21
thanks
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 23:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 21:50:14 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > The daemon does a call to getaddrinfo() to figure out which addresses it
> > should listen on and tries each one. Currently at lea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595779 unblock: cvsd/1.0.21
Bug #595779 [release.debian.org] unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: cvsd/1.0.21' from 'unblock: cvsd/1.0.20'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 22:34:58 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> If getaddrinfo() returns an IPv6 address and an IPv4 address the bind()
> for the IPv4 address will fail unless IPV6_V6ONLY is set or the
> net.ipv6.bindv6only sysctl is set to 1.
>
Argh, you're right. I should have tested this, sor
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 22:20 +0200, Carl Chenet wrote:
> I'm requiring an freeze exception to get the new python-tornado package
> currently in Sid into Squeeze.
Requesting, one hopes. ;-)
> It would allow the "bup" package to get
> rid of a embedded python-tornado library and to depend on the new
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:07:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > It would allow the "bup" package to get
> > rid of a embedded python-tornado library and to depend on the new
> > python-tornado package, which is a cleaner situation.
It is my intention (bup maintainer - hello!) to request a fre
Hi,
On Wed Sep 08, 2010 at 13:49:34 +0200, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote:
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Please unblock the package pacemaker-mgmt. Right now, it is
Dear Release Managers:
I would like to request you to unblock dojo to allow 1.4.3+dfsg1-1 into
squeeze.
This package version resolves a release critical bug (#591961) that involved a
DFSG policy violation.
Thank you.
pgp7R1SPhYml5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear release team,
I'm new to Debian package maintainership so please forgive me if this question
is dumb: A package I maintain (amavisd-milter) is recommend by amavisd-new
upstream as a replacement for their amavisd-new-milter program which got
removed. Talking with Debian amavisd-new maintainer
Michael Gilbert writes:
> This solution may be more complicated than necessary. I just re-read
> backports' documentation. It looks like automatic updates are prevented
> due to the use of the 'NotAutomatic' flag in the release file. I'd be
> interested in understanding the logic for that sett
Hi team,
I've been trying to fix issues in php-xml-serializer. I think I managed
to fix the PHP 5.3 deprecation issue, however, after my last upload to
SID, I realized that there was still quite some issues in it, noticeably
that the package is still sending some docs in
/usr/share/php/{docs,tests
Hi,
A recent RC bug has been opened against my package gajim, so I fixed it
and a new package has been uploaded.
The difference with the one currently in squeeze is only in rules file
and in control files. Nothing has changed in sources (same upstream
release).
Could you include it in squeez
Package: release.debian.org
Hi release team,
Please grant a freeze exception for ppl, version 0.10.2-8, which is now built
on all architectures. The changelog entries read as follows (also including
0.10.2-7 as that never entered testing):
ppl (0.10.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Ignore testsui
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package weborf
The upstream release fixes RC bug #596112
unblock weborf/0.12.3-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (9
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> This question also goes to Federico Gimenez Nieto, the current
> maintainer: Frederico, would you mind if your package were to debhelper
> instead of CDBS from now on? I can do that work if you don't have enough
> time to fix it.
>
Feel free to make any chang
97 matches
Mail list logo
