On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:02:33 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > On 09/08/2010 04:26 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > That isn't really a fair comparison. I campaigned (unsuccessfully) to > > keep webkit out of lenny at the time since it was so > > experimental/unsupportable. Thus I had no interest in supporting > > that. However, I'm planning to help support webkit in squeeze, so I > > don't foresee such an issue in the future. > > Ok, so you campaigned to keep webkit out of lenny because now it is > unsupportable. Now I have the same question you made for chromium. Are > you sure this will not happen again?
I campaigned to keep webkit out of lenny because I foresaw it as unsupportable then (and now we have evidence that confirms that). I think its come a long way since then, and I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze. On the other hand, I don't think chromium is supportable yet, which is why I don't think it should be in squeeze. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100908110457.07015063.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
