On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:43:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
> > > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
> > > libraries bu
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
> > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
> > libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like
> > gpredict
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
> What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
> libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like
> gpredict and gnucash and plenty of others.
>
> Why is libpng10 being removed if it
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:11:40AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> However, glademm also build-depends on libgnomemm-dev, which is uninstallable
> due (indirectly) to the removal of libpng10-0. The plan according to
> debian-gtk-gnome is to remove all the GNOME 1 packages. Most of them depend
>
nt.
>
> So at this point I think glademm and orbit2cpp should be kicked out of
> etch, but libbonobo[ui]mm1.3 should be kicked out of unstable as well.
>
> Shall I file a bug against ftp.debian.org? Is the standard practice to
> file a bug per source package -- that seems like
Nathanael Nerode schrieb:
> Steve Langasek wrote on debian-release:
>
>>And glademm build-depends on libbonobouimm1.3-dev. This may be a bug, but
>>the net result is that there's more here than just unused libraries.
>
>
> However, glademm also build-depends on libgnomemm-dev, which is uninstal
the removal of libpng10-0. The plan according to
debian-gtk-gnome is to remove all the GNOME 1 packages. Most of them depend
on gdk-imlib1, which depends on libpng10 and has no replacement.
So at this point I think glademm and orbit2cpp should be kicked out of
etch, but libbonobo[ui]mm1.3 should be
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:53:35PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Bradley Bell appears to be missing in action.
Or on vacation.
> orbit2cpp has only the unused libbonobomm1.3 and libbonobouimm1.3
> as reverse depends. It currently has a nasty misbuilt version on ARM,
> and d
Bradley Bell appears to be missing in action.
orbit2cpp has only the unused libbonobomm1.3 and libbonobouimm1.3
as reverse depends. It currently has a nasty misbuilt version on ARM,
and doesn't build properly on ARM due to a GCC bug.
Perhaps these should all be dropped from unstable. But
9 matches
Mail list logo
