On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:43:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > > > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are > > > libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like > > > gpredict and gnucash and plenty of others. > > > > > > Why is libpng10 being removed if it is still needed? > > > > It isn't. All packages depending on it can safely be rebuilt against > > libpng12.
> Great. Then there is no need to remove gdk-imlib1? No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer libpng. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
