ganz ohne Hilfe gehen lassen, also:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:44:14AM +0200, Frank Hofmann wrote:
> ich habe ein Problem mit apt-get update. Wenn ich mein installiertes Lenny
> updaten möchte bekomme ich immer folgende Fehler.
>
> OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main
Hi
ich habe ein Problem mit apt-get update. Wenn ich mein installiertes Lenny
updaten möchte bekomme ich immer folgende Fehler.
OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main Sources
OK http://http.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Sources
Es wurden 4642kB in 14s geholt (328kB/s)
Paketlisten
-linux, which wants a new dpkg, which breaks
konqueror. Apt's best solution here seems to be a half-ass upgrade of varous
KDE related things, and removing the rest.
After removing the Breaks: konqueror in dpkg, the result of apt-get install
udev looks kind of sane.
apt-get -o
Hello
I have upgraded 4 different machines from Lenny to Squeeze. At first I
followed the instructions in the release notes to use apt-get
dist-upgrade rather than aptitude. I found the this threw up a whole
lot of packages not installed through dependency issues, which I then
sorted out
On 2006-09-28 Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get update is still very verbose about the pdiff updates:
> [about 300 lines with "Get: ..."]
> Get:334 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
> Get:335 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
[...]
> if i didn't
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> hello,
>
> apt-get update is still very verbose about the pdiff updates:
>
> [about 300 lines with "Get: ..."]
> Get:334 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
> Get:335 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
> Get:336 2006-09-27-1319.38.pdiff [4
hello,
apt-get update is still very verbose about the pdiff updates:
[about 300 lines with "Get: ..."]
Get:334 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
Get:335 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
Get:336 2006-09-27-1319.38.pdiff [4821B]
Get:337 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB]
Get:338 2006-09-
Mattias,
Your mail client incorrectly claims that you are using iso-8859-1 as a
charset when your message is encoded in windows-1252. Please fix this.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:46:59PM +0200, Mattias Wiberg wrote:
> apt-get install samba
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building d
I’m not sure wich list i should contact or ask
for help for my problem so i hope there’s no hard feelings.
I am about to install samba with apt-get install
samba and getting the following error:
apt-get install samba
Reading
package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Le Mercredi 6 Avril 2005 00:22, Frans Pop a ÃcritÂ:
> Is the release team aware of this issue?
> Will migration to testing of the new vim be blocked automatically
> until this is solved?
the problem is known, and already addressed (see #303266)
in fact, the bug is already closed in the current svn
ther KDE packagers about the headaches
that metapackages with everything on their Depends line give us.
We have considered moving most dependencies to recommends, and explicitly
note in the description that "This package has to be installed with
the following command: `aptitude install -
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 06:22 pm, Frans Pop wrote:
> Is the release team aware of this issue?
> Will migration to testing of the new vim be blocked automatically until
> this is solved?
It's even more fun if you're using aptitude, because then you get this:
(A) apt says "oh, kvim is broken.
de
in woody at all. So this is probably a sarge->sid upgrade problem and so
not RC at all. In some quick upgrade tests the effect wasn't really
grave, too (removing kde, kdeaddons, vimpart and kvim in case of apt-get and
setting kvim on hold in case of aptitude).
Gruesse
--
Frank Lichten
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:22:05AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Is the release team aware of this issue?
> Will migration to testing of the new vim be blocked automatically until
> this is solved?
The question is: what is "the issue". kde is certainly installable
(you will probably end up with vim-g
Is the release team aware of this issue?
Will migration to testing of the new vim be blocked automatically until
this is solved?
Cheers,
FJP
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: apt-get dist-upgrade will remove metapackages
Date: Tuesday 05 April 2005 23:25
From: "Pede
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:54:43AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:33:36PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > Matt, if your tree does only contain bugfixes and translations, they
> > might be willing to accept a new version after a careful revision of the
> > diff.
> I coul
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:33:36PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Matt, if your tree does only contain bugfixes and translations, they
> might be willing to accept a new version after a careful revision of the
> diff.
I could perhaps backport the patch if the release managers feel it is
appropriat
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:06:31PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thursday 23 September 2004 06:11 pm, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > There is at least on possiblity to achieve this that I know of:
> > aptitude lists all "obsolete" packages in an extra category.
> > So one can just start aptitude
On Thursday 23 September 2004 06:11 pm, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> There is at least on possiblity to achieve this that I know of:
> aptitude lists all "obsolete" packages in an extra category.
> So one can just start aptitude and remove all packages listed there.
> (of course this only works if yo
uot;Dr. Andreas Krüger\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -
>
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:12:21 +0200
> From: "\"Dr. Andreas Krüger\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMA
üger\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:12:21 +0200
From: "\"Dr. Andreas Krüger\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need "apt
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 13:50:32 +0500, Oleg Leschov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Как регулировать условия, при которых apt-get (apt 0.5.5.1) пытается
> скачать обновляемые пакеты, не спросив пользователя и не показав верси
> и? Вроде-бы, так он поступает, когда общий р
Как регулировать условия, при которых apt-get (apt 0.5.5.1) пытается
скачать обновляемые пакеты, не спросив пользователя и не показав версии?
Вроде-бы, так он поступает, когда общий размер не превышает пары
мегабайт, а я хочу, чтобы он всегда просил подтверждения. В man apt-get
ответ не
23 matches
Mail list logo
