On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:33:36PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Matt, if your tree does only contain bugfixes and translations, they > might be willing to accept a new version after a careful revision of the > diff.
I could perhaps backport the patch if the release managers feel it is appropriate, but I'm hesitant to do so in order to fix what seems to be a cosmetic bug. This message is only displayed for a very brief time, and does not (in my opinion) detract from apt's usability. > Anyway, did you end up fixing all of the issues? If not, can you tell me > what your arch repo is so I can have a look at the rest of the methods, > and whatever info you remember of the one that wasn't quite working? I only fixed the issue in the http method. If there are others, I think they can probably be fixed in the same way, just let me know what you see. I don't remember clearly what other problems there may have been. The arch repository can be found here: tla register-archive http://people.debian.org/~mdz/arch/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The name of the mainline branch is apt--main--0. > PS: also, upoading to unstable won't harm anyone, even if it ends up not > getting into testing. :) I prefer not to complicate the situation by uploading things to unstable which are not appropriate for the release, since my understanding is that testing-proposed-updates is not at 100% yet. I'll accept whatever the release team says is appropriate, though. -- - mdz
