Hi,
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt
>> wrote:
>> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> [...]
>> > Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
>>
>> Thank you for your rev
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
[...]
> > Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
>
> Thank you for your review.
Any ETA for an upload?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> OK, I fixed the following in 0.18.9-5.
>>
>> -
>> openvrml (0.18.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> * Move example directory in libopen
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> OK, I fixed the following in 0.18.9-5.
>
> -
> openvrml (0.18.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Move example directory in libopenvrml9 to libopenvrml-doc.
> * Add "Multi-Arch: same" to libopenvrml9
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #690610 [release.debian.org] unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
690610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:00 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> > am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> >> However, I think that it is already late
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:00 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> >> However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x.
> >> If this still does (if a rel
Hi, Philipp.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Nobuhiro,
>
> am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x.
>> If this still does (if a release team permits this), I will set linu
Nobuhiro,
am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x.
> If this still does (if a release team permits this), I will set linux-any .
you could testbuild it on the porter box, but a new build wouldn't
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> Please unblock package openvrml.
>> I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4.
>>
>> - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690610 [release.debian.org] unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
690610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Please unblock package openvrml.
> I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4.
>
> - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489)
Specifically, _remove_ multiarch support. Might
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package openvrml.
I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4.
- Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489)
- Enable hardening and fix FTBF
13 matches
Mail list logo
