Hi,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Adam D. Barratt
<a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> Please unblock package openvrml.
>> I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4.
>>
>> - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489)
>
> Specifically, _remove_ multiarch support. Might it have made sense to
> move the files to openvrml-doc instead?
OK, I will check and fix.
>
>> - Enable hardening and fix FTBFS with -Werror=format-security option.
>> - Change dh_clean to dh_prep in install target. (Closes: #683482)
>> - Fix FTBFS on mips.
>
> Why do the binary packages have a manually maintained architecture list
> in any case? If the intent is to have the package only build on Linux
> architectures, then specifying "linux-any" would be more maintainable
> than a hand-crafted list that includes unofficial artchitectures such as
> alpha, hppa, avr32, sh4 and m68k but is missing s390x. Alternatively,
> they should simply be "any".
>
I noticed this.
However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x.
If this still does (if a release team permits this), I will set linux-any .
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cabmqnvkjazkjqknspgmfn2jlhfwuaedq8xkw6o-ddbzjvjh...@mail.gmail.com
