Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Please unblock package openvrml. > I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4. > > - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489)
Specifically, _remove_ multiarch support. Might it have made sense to move the files to openvrml-doc instead? > - Enable hardening and fix FTBFS with -Werror=format-security option. > - Change dh_clean to dh_prep in install target. (Closes: #683482) > - Fix FTBFS on mips. Why do the binary packages have a manually maintained architecture list in any case? If the intent is to have the package only build on Linux architectures, then specifying "linux-any" would be more maintainable than a hand-crafted list that includes unofficial artchitectures such as alpha, hppa, avr32, sh4 and m68k but is missing s390x. Alternatively, they should simply be "any". Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350424079.17605.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
