On 2012-09-19 22:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please could you expand a little on why you feel adding the dependency
> would be a better solution than making the use of udev optional via the
> LSB headers as (as you noted) was done for wheezy?
I do not know the lvm2 package well enough to judge wh
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 17:03 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I've prepared a NMU for lvm that fixes #603036: "lvm2: fails to install
> due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header"
[...]
> I'm just adding the udev dependency to the lvm2 package, not touching
> the initscript (which has been u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I've prepared a NMU for lvm that fixes #603036: "lvm2: fails to install
due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header"
The bug is tagged squeeze-ignore:
On Monday, 27. December 2010 00
3 matches
Mail list logo