On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 17:03 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I've prepared a NMU for lvm that fixes #603036: "lvm2: fails to install > due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header" [...] > I'm just adding the udev dependency to the lvm2 package, not touching > the initscript (which has been updated for wheezy to make udev > optional). This just makes the current situation (udev has to be > installed for lvm to work) explicit.
As a rule of thumb, we generally prefer taking the fixes used in unstable where they're applicable, as they've (in theory) been better tested. Please could you expand a little on why you feel adding the dependency would be a better solution than making the use of udev optional via the LSB headers as (as you noted) was done for wheezy? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348088116.26713.22.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
