On 2012-09-19 22:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please could you expand a little on why you feel adding the dependency > would be a better solution than making the use of udev optional via the > LSB headers as (as you noted) was done for wheezy?
I do not know the lvm2 package well enough to judge whether "fixing the initscript" is a safe solution for squeeze (or if there are some other implicit dependencies relying on the current setup) and if there may have been other related fixes in wheezy. So I did not want to touch the initscript dependency graph in squeeze (i.e. removing an edge). Instead I thought explicitly adding the package dependency that currently makes lvm2 "just work" out of the box should have less potential to cause problems. I just forwarded the thread to #603036 (that I want to get fixed), perhaps the maintainers have some more input on this. Looks like I missed to set a proper X-Debbugs-Cc initially ... Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505aca53.90...@abeckmann.de
