On Thursday 16 December 2010 11:55:05 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> On the note of ia32-libs-gtk. It seems that was rejected by an
> overzelous lintian check. It doesn't depend on libc (no kidding :).
> I will have to check that and add lintian overrides to it or get lintian
> fixed.
Is there prog
Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 18:01:05 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors
>> welcome.
>
> I have uploaded this now. I think this needs unblocking so that ia32-libs can
> also migrate.
>
> I've also sponsored ia32-l
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15:29:00 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've also sponsored ia32-libs-gtk/20101125 which could also need an
> unblock.
Unfortunately this got rejected:
Reject Reasons:
ia32-libs-gtk: lintian output: 'missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./lib32/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.2
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 15:29:00 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I have uploaded this now. I think this needs unblocking so that
> ia32-libs can also migrate.
>
Unblocked.
> I've also sponsored ia32-libs-gtk/20101125 which could also need an unblock.
>
dak says:
20101215143236|process-upload|da
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 18:01:05 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors
> welcome.
I have uploaded this now. I think this needs unblocking so that ia32-libs can
also migrate.
I've also sponsored ia32-libs-gtk/20101125 which could also need
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 09:31, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
> That one FTBFS for me with:
Sorry for the noise. I was just pointed at the fact, that this is the
expected behaviour when building an ia64 package on amd64 :(
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-
Hi!
Am 07.12.2010 18:01, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors
> welcome.
That one FTBFS for me with:
dh_builddeb -s
dh_builddeb: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but
there are none of that type.
dpkg-genchanges >../ia3
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 08:37 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:24:01 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > > ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>> > > ia32-libs
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:12:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 08:37 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:24:01 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > ia32-libs-core (20101117)
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 08:37 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:24:01 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
> > > ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:24:01 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
> > ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>
> I just uploaded these to sid.
I think ia32-libs-core still n
Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>> ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>
> I just uploaded these to sid.
>
> I hope they can be unblocked and their urgency pushed by the releas
Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>> ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>
> I just uploaded these to sid.
Thx.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
> ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
I just uploaded these to sid.
I hope they can be unblocked and their urgency pushed by the release team if
they think it's appropria
"Thijs Kinkhorst" writes:
> As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
> should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations, is this
> really necessary to get ia32-libs unblocked?
>
> I can take a look at wine later this week if no-one beats me to it and if
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:21:19 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>
>> > As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
>> > should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations,
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:21:19 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>
>> > As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
>> > should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations,
On Saturday 13 November 2010 00:10:56 Julien Cristau wrote:
> Dropping wine means dropping those, fwiw. Not that I really care, but
> if somebody does want to keep wine in squeeze the build fix seems
> trivial enough...
For the record, the build fix has been uploaded to delayed/7 last week; not
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped
> with Lenny, we should rather dump it completely.
>
# Broken Depends:
dssi-vst/contrib: dssi-vst [amd64 i386]
lmms: lmms [amd64 i386]
pptview/non-free: p
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:56:44 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> alsa-plugins, nspluginwrapper, fglrx-driver, nvidia-graphics-drivers,
> and sun-java6 all build-depend on ia32-libs, and build successfully
> without ia32-libs-dev. libvdpau doesn't. I've uploaded a fix for that
> to mentors:
> http
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:21:19 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> > As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
> > should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations, is this
> > really necessary to
On 11/09/2010 06:35 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Michael Gilbert writes:
>>
>>> Well, it's more like one hundred packages, but nevertheless, a very
>>> large number. Obviously its a trade off, just like everything else in
>>> this world.
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael Gilbert writes:
>
> > Well, it's more like one hundred packages, but nevertheless, a very
> > large number. Obviously its a trade off, just like everything else in
> > this world. Either take the easy road and continue to provide
Michael Gilbert writes:
> Well, it's more like one hundred packages, but nevertheless, a very
> large number. Obviously its a trade off, just like everything else in
> this world. Either take the easy road and continue to provide this
> messy monolithic package that doesn't get any security upd
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:43:00 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Why is it that ia32-libs provides all of these 32-bit libs as a
>> monolithic package anyway? Wouldn't the saner solution be to provide
>> each desired 32-bit lib from the o
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:43:00 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Why is it that ia32-libs provides all of these 32-bit libs as a
> monolithic package anyway? Wouldn't the saner solution be to provide
> each desired 32-bit lib from the original source package for that lib
> (for example bzip2 prov
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:21:19 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> > As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
> > should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations, is this
> > really necessary to
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we
> should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations, is this
> really necessary to get ia32-libs unblocked?
>
No. I just didn't want to unblock it u
On Tue, November 9, 2010 05:21, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov  8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>
>>> Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already
>>> shipped
>>> with Lenny, we should rather
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>
>>> Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped
>>> with Lenny, we should rather du
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
>> Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped
>> with Lenny, we should rather dump it completely. A 1.2 release could be
>> introduced in a poi
31 matches
Mail list logo
