On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:21:19 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 15:41:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > As for ia32-libs, I would be willing to sponsor it but I don't think we > > should be making uploads for such trivial cleanup operations, is this > > really necessary to get ia32-libs unblocked? > > > No. I just didn't want to unblock it until the wine issue was resolved. > > I'm still not convinced ia32-libs-dev is a useful/sane thing to ship. > Providing a working runtime environment for 32bit programs is one thing. > Providing a build environment is another entirely, and the way it has to > mangle .la files (and now .pc too) makes me wonder what other sort of > brokenness it lets through. I probably won't object to this if the > current breakage gets fixed though, because I'm getting tired of this > package and would rather do something useful instead. > > alsa-plugins also build-depends on ia32-libs, does it need a fix for the > new stuff too? what about libvdpau?
alsa-plugins, nspluginwrapper, fglrx-driver, nvidia-graphics-drivers, and sun-java6 all build-depend on ia32-libs, and build successfully without ia32-libs-dev. libvdpau doesn't. I've uploaded a fix for that to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101111175644.c95f2536.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
