Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Theodore Ts'o wrote: > What's the schedule for 3.1r2? I think that this is serious enough > that we should get it into 3.1r1, and have the updated package > prepareds, but I accept that I might be biased on the matter, and in > the end it's really up to the stable release management team. What >

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-29 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:35:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If you think this is a fix that can't wait for 3.1r2, then yes, please > go ahead. > The nature of the bug is that if you are using something which uses extended attributes (Samba, SELinux, ACL's, for example), and your filesyst

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:41:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:08:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > >

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-27 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:08:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > > When is the first stable update pla

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > When is the first stable update planned to be released? > > > > > > I would like to update sarge before Sept

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > When is the first stable update planned to be released? > > > > I would like to update sarge before September, but haven't heard > > back from ftpmaster yet whether this would be p

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-23 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > When is the first stable update planned to be released? > > I would like to update sarge before September, but haven't heard > back from ftpmaster yet whether this would be possible. In that case, given tha

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-22 Thread Martin Schulze
Theodore Ts'o wrote: > When is the first stable update planned to be released? I would like to update sarge before September, but haven't heard back from ftpmaster yet whether this would be possible. Regards, Joey -- MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle -- To

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:17:26PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:24:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Thanks! I've just uploaded e2fsprogs_1.37-2sarge2. > Oops. It was rejected due to e2fsprogs_1.37-2sarge2 being newer than > what's in testing. > This is apparen

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-22 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:24:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Thanks! I've just uploaded e2fsprogs_1.37-2sarge2. > Oops. It was rejected due to e2fsprogs_1.37-2sarge2 being newer than what's in testing. This is apparently because e2fsprogs has been frozen, so newer versions have not be

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-22 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:30:09AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:20:49PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > > I would like to upload the following release to sarge to fix a grave bug > > > (#318463), and taking the opportunity to fix a few oth

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-22 Thread Martin Schulze
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:20:49PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > I would like to upload the following release to sarge to fix a grave bug > > (#318463), and taking the opportunity to fix a few other potential > > core-dumping inducing bugs. All of these are cherry pick

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-21 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Should I go ahead and upload the following to stable-proposed updates? > > > > e2fsprogs (1.37-2sarge2) testing; urgency=low >^^^ > > If so, please be sure to fix the target in the changelog :) O

Re: Bug#318463: Proposed update to e2fsprogs for stable

2005-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:20:49PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I would like to upload the following release to sarge to fix a grave bug > (#318463), and taking the opportunity to fix a few other potential > core-dumping inducing bugs. All of these are cherry picked from the > e2fsprogs developm