On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:41:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:08:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > > > When is the first stable update planned to be released? > > > > > > > > > > I would like to update sarge before September, but haven't heard > > > > > back from ftpmaster yet whether this would be possible. > > > > > > > > In that case, given that timeline, and given that testing is going to > > > > be frozen at 1.37-2sarge1 for several weeks, could you arrange an > > > > override so that 1.37-2sarge-2 can get into stable-proposed-updates?
> > > I have no power over the archive. > > > Maybe Steve or Colin can help. > > Sorry, we don't have any more access to override katie's version > > constraints than you do. There's been discussion about whether uploads > > to s-p-u should have the same effect of back-propagating to t-p-u and > > unstable that stable-security does, but I don't think any real > > conclusion has been reached yet. > > The other option would be to upload a version of e2fsprogs built against > > glibc 2.3.2 to testing-proposed-updates, allow it to be installed, and > > then upload to stable as well. Not that I'm keen on letting large > > updates in through t-p-u, but given that these are important fixes that > > testing is also missing, it seems reasonable to try. > OK, so what is the best way forward at this point? Should I try > uploading e2fsprogs to t-p-u, then? If you think this is a fix that can't wait for 3.1r2, then yes, please go ahead. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
