Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 transition: ruby3.3-add
Bug #1090913 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby3.3
Changed Bug title to 'transition: ruby3.3-add' from 'transition: ruby3.3'.
--
1090913: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090913
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Control: retitle -1 transition: ruby3.3-add
On 23/01/2025 09:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 23/01/2025 02:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
ruby-defaults/1:3.3~0 was uploaded to experimental with ruby3.3 as the default
and removing ruby3.1.
I generated a list of package to rebuild using the fo
On 23/01/2025 02:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
ruby-defaults/1:3.3~0 was uploaded to experimental with ruby3.3 as the default
and removing ruby3.1.
I generated a list of package to rebuild using the following ben file:
title = "ruby3.3-default";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby3.1/ | .depends ~ /r
ruby-defaults/1:3.3~0 was uploaded to experimental with ruby3.3 as the
default and removing ruby3.1.
I generated a list of package to rebuild using the following ben file:
title = "ruby3.3-default";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby3.1/ | .depends ~ /ruby3.3/) & !.source ~
/^(ruby3.1|ruby3.3|rub
> Em 21 de jan. de 2025, à(s) 10:01, Antonio Terceiro
> escreveu:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 01:35:39PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
* redland-bindings (orphan package)
>>
>> Why does this need to be removed? It doesn't have an RC bug, and seems to
>> only build against the de
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 01:35:39PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > * redland-bindings (orphan package)
>
> Why does this need to be removed? It doesn't have an RC bug, and seems to
> only build against the default ruby, so it doesn't seem buggy in terms of
> this transition.
True. I th
On 16/01/2025 12:54, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the message
above.
In order to help the transition, I'd lik
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
> pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the message
> above.
>
> In order to help the transition, I'd like to request the removal of
> the fol
On 10/01/2025 17:46, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:08:07 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 09/01/2025 20:05, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > Hi Emilio,
> >
> > On 09/01/2025 12:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 30/12/2024 21:38, Lu
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:08:07 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 09/01/2025 20:05, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > Hi Emilio,
> >
> > On 09/01/2025 12:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 30/12/2024 21:38, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> >>> We filed bugs for the pac
On 10/01/2025 06:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 09/01/2025 17:24, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 09/01/2025 12:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On 30/12/2024 21:29, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 09/01/2025 20:05, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 09/01/2025 12:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/12/2024 21:38, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
We filed bugs for the packages that are failing to build with ruby 3.3 and
are not in the removal request list above
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1090913 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby3.3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1090913: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090913
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 09/01/2025 17:24, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 09/01/2025 12:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On 30/12/2024 21:29, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the mes
Hi Emilio,
On 09/01/2025 12:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/12/2024 21:38, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
We filed bugs for the packages that are failing to build with ruby
3.3 and are not in the removal request list above:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-
r...@lis
Hi Emilio,
On 09/01/2025 12:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On 30/12/2024 21:29, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the message
above.
In order to help the transition,
Hi Lucas,
On 30/12/2024 21:29, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the message
above.
In order to help the transition, I'd like to request the removal of
the following source, and a
On 30/12/2024 21:38, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
We filed bugs for the packages that are failing to build with ruby 3.3 and are
not in the removal request list above:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-
r...@lists.debian.org&tag=ruby3.3
What's the plan for those? I.e. what
We filed bugs for the packages that are failing to build with ruby 3.3
and are not in the removal request list above:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org&tag=ruby3.3
--
Lucas Kanashiro
I am moving the content of the removal bug to here, as requested by
pochu on IRC. I will be closing the removal bug linked in the message
above.
In order to help the transition, I'd like to request the removal of
the following source, and associated binary, packages from testing
to unblock the r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to start the transition to ruby 3.3 in unstable. General
information about Ruby transitions can be found in:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions
r
21 matches
Mail list logo
