> Em 21 de jan. de 2025, à(s) 10:01, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> 
> escreveu:
> 
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 01:35:39PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> * redland-bindings (orphan package)
>> 
>> Why does this need to be removed? It doesn't have an RC bug, and seems to
>> only build against the default ruby, so it doesn't seem buggy in terms of
>> this transition.
> 
> True. I think this was included in the list by mistake. I even tried a
> rebuild with src:ruby-defaults from experimental (making 3.3 the
> default and dropping 3.1) and it built just fine.

If you follow the thread you will see that I sent an updated list which does 
not contain this package (and some others).

Lucas Kanashiro

Reply via email to