> Em 21 de jan. de 2025, à(s) 10:01, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> > escreveu: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 01:35:39PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> * redland-bindings (orphan package) >> >> Why does this need to be removed? It doesn't have an RC bug, and seems to >> only build against the default ruby, so it doesn't seem buggy in terms of >> this transition. > > True. I think this was included in the list by mistake. I even tried a > rebuild with src:ruby-defaults from experimental (making 3.3 the > default and dropping 3.1) and it built just fine. If you follow the thread you will see that I sent an updated list which does not contain this package (and some others). Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3... Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ... Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Processed: Re: Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Debian Bug Tracking System
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Antonio Terceiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Antonio Terceiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Lucas Kanashiro
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
- Processed: Re: Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3 Debian Bug Tracking System
- Bug#1090913: marked as done (transition: ruby3.... Debian Bug Tracking System