Hello Paul,
Thanks for hinting it through. I'll let you know if it comes up again
in a way which suggests the problem is more serious than thought.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Adrian,
On 22-12-2024 09:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Sun, 2024-12-22 at 09:29 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 22-12-2024 02:46, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
useless on
Hi,
On Sun, 2024-12-22 at 09:29 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 22-12-2024 02:46, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
> > > useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?
> >
> > I
Hi,
On 22-12-2024 02:46, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?
I would doubt that it means that sbcl is useless on ppc64el because of
how up
Hello,
On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
> useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?
I would doubt that it means that sbcl is useless on ppc64el because of
how upstream can't reproduce the problem.
Dear ppc64el porters: ping.
Dear Sean,
On 02-12-2024 07:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
this. I think that either we s
Hello,
On Mon 02 Dec 2024 at 07:38am +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,
>
> @porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest regressions
> caused by sbcl [1]?
>
> On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream are
Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,
@porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest
regressions caused by sbcl [1]?
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's
Hello Release Team,
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure
on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you thin
9 matches
Mail list logo
