Hi, On 22-12-2024 02:46, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?I would doubt that it means that sbcl is useless on ppc64el because of how upstream can't reproduce the problem.
Ack. Let's give the porters a few more days, and otherwise accept the regression of cl-ironclad and cl-postmodern on ppc64el.
My offer of access to a testbed on the ci.d.n infrastucture still stands. Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
