Dear ppc64el porters: ping. Dear Sean,
On 02-12-2024 07:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you think that would be warranted.cl-ironclad *and* cl-postmodern. And the error is identical: no size function for object at 0x100009bf80 (widetag 0x33)
How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?
Removal of sbcl on ppc64el seems to be going to be non-trivial as it's a key package via cl-cffi which is needed for brltty which is very important for our accessibility support (pulled in via d-i if I'm not mistaken).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
