Re: More Assignments

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 143 lines --] > > Here are 15 to remove. FWIW I looked at a total of ~50 packages to find > these. All bugs have been chosschecked against the NMU claims page which > is why mindi and mondo are not

Re: More Assignments

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:38:16PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote: > Package: pxfonts > Testing: 1.0+1-5 > Unstable: 1.0+1-5 > Bugs: 195932 202535 > Suggestion: remove-from-testing, remove-from-unstable > Analysis: > Package hasn't had an upload since 2002-03-20. Package has been > merged into tete

Re: More Assignments

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 05:59:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:38:16PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote: > > Please pardon me if I duplicated anyone's work, I can't see > > ftp-master:~ajt/release-assistants/claims/ to check... ;-) > > You can check the web interface: > >

Re: More Assignments

El mié, 27-08-2003 a las 05:55, Guillem Jover escribió: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:06:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > All bugs have been chosschecked against the NMU claims page which > > is why mindi and mondo are not on this list -- yet. > > [ package list to be removed from testing with RC b

Re: More Assignments

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:38:16PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote: > Please pardon me if I duplicated anyone's work, I can't see > ftp-master:~ajt/release-assistants/claims/ to check... ;-) You can check the web interface: > Let me know if this is useful, Y

Re: More Assignments

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:06:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > All bugs have been chosschecked against the NMU claims page which > is why mindi and mondo are not on this list -- yet. [ package list to be removed from testing with RC bugs ] About mindi bugs, I sent patches (Ok one with both fixes) t

Re: More Assignments

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello RM/RAs, I've been following this list for quite a while, and even though I'm not a DD (yet) and therefore can't NMU pkgs, I figure there's enough work that I can do to help out the release process while I simmer in the NM queue. So here goes my

Re: More Assignments

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:39:20PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:09:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Package: elvis [...] > > > Suggestion: remove-from-testing > > This is claimed on the NMU claims page by [EMAIL PROTECTED], and there is a > > patch. Given peter's las

Re: More Assignments

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:57:21PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote: > Am Mo, 2003-08-25 um 18.12 schrieb Colin Watson: > > Package: gnews > > Testing: 0.1.3-2 > > Unstable: 0.1.3-2 > > Bugs: 183240 > > Suggestion: remove-from-testing > > Analysis: > > Uninstallable, bug open for five months. Waiting for

Re: More Assignments

Am Mo, 2003-08-25 um 18.12 schrieb Colin Watson: > > This week's assignment is to pick between 10 and 20 source packages > > each to be removed from testing and/or unstable. Assignments are due > > next Monday (25th), and should look like: > Package: gnews > Testing:

Re: More Assignments

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:09:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Package: elvis > > Testing: 2.1.4-4.2 > > Unstable: 2.1.4-4.2 > > Bugs: 189630 > > Suggestion: remove-from-testing > > Analysis: > > FTBFS for 4 months. Package is orphaned; bug changed to 'ITA' ~2 > > months ago, no upload activity

Re: More Assignments

> Package: elvis > Testing: 2.1.4-4.2 > Unstable: 2.1.4-4.2 > Bugs: 189630 > Suggestion: remove-from-testing > Analysis: > FTBFS for 4 months. Package is orphaned; bug changed to 'ITA' ~2 > months ago, no upload activity seen. Plenty of other vi's to go > around. (The bug has been claimed for

Re: More Assignments

Here are 15 to remove. FWIW I looked at a total of ~50 packages to find these. All bugs have been chosschecked against the NMU claims page which is why mindi and mondo are not on this list -- yet. Package: mantis Testing: 0.17.5-6 Unstable: 0.17.5-7 Bugs: 199985 Suggestion: remove-from-testing Ana

Re: More Assignments

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 05:32:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > This week's assignment is to pick between 10 and 20 source packages > each to be removed from testing and/or unstable. Assignments are due > next Monday (25th), and should look like: > > Package: pretzel &g

Re: More Assignments

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 05:32:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > This week's assignment is to pick between 10 and 20 source packages > each to be removed from testing and/or unstable. Assignments are due > next Monday (25th), and should look like: > Package: pretzel >

Re: More Assignments

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:40:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > While working through this, I started thinking it would be useful to be > able to coordinate in more detail than just the contents of the claims > directory, so we could tell not only which packages each of us *is* > recommending for

Re: More Assignments

I only found out about this assignment today. Probably just an itchy 'd' finger. I'll try to find at least ten by monday. -- see shy jo pgpuLajkBprVe.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: More Assignments

Cc's dropped. On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:40:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > While working through this, I started thinking it would be useful to be > able to coordinate in more detail than just the contents of the claims > directory, Feel free to create, say, claims/vorlon.details. Heck, fee

Re: More Assignments

Hey all, On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 05:32:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > This week's assignment is to pick between 10 and 20 source packages > each to be removed from testing and/or unstable. Assignments are due > next Monday (25th), and should look like: >

More Assignments

[Cc'ed to RA's for the shock value] Hi guys, This week's assignment is to pick between 10 and 20 source packages each to be removed from testing and/or unstable. Assignments are due next Monday (25th), and should look like: Package: pretzel Testing: 2.0n-1.1

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

Hi, On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 03:06:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:23:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > 151461 [ ] device3dfx-source: fails to build > > Guillem Jover downgraded this to important (correctly, I think), and > observed that there's a patch in

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > 155374 [P ] Where are Installation Manual and Release Notes BTW this one is specific to the old installation system. The (supposed) contents of the install-doc package for debian-installer is yet to be even drafted. The bu

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Steve Langasek > 187905/hamfax followup: NMU? mark as MIA/orphaned? NMUed. Maintainer has been seen recently on the debian-hams list, but only to say he no longer uses another ham-related package; has not yet replied to prodd

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package seems largely unmaintained (there's also a serious bug filed, > recently with a patch), but the maintainer is active elsewhere in > Debian. I've sent a ping and will NMU if nothing comes of it. > >> mrouted, According to the pimd package,

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > 146103 followup: any progress on 186299? any progress re: workaround? A workaround (in fact, a correction to buggy code which caused the compiler error) was suggested by gcc upstream, and I forwarded it to #146103. As soon as I

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

Anthony Towns wrote: > Joey Hess > 157913 [ ] FTBFS: conflicting declarations This bug is not reproducible on unstable ia64. There are plenty more though, that make it fail to build. Pavel Tcholakov is already being tracked by MIA tracking. I have NMU'd hylafax (5-day delayed), fixing

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

Anthony Towns writes: > gtk+2.0 is also out of date on arm, because its build-dependencies failed > to install correctly on the autobuilder: > >Re-checking for JadeTeX memory dumps ... >ERROR: JadeTeX memory dump (jadetex.fmt) cannot be found >ERROR: PDFJadeTeX memory dump (pdfjadete

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 06:18:21PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > -alsa-lib-0.5 > (Posting this now since it's changing day by day and I'm getting the > feeling that other people are working on very nearly the same problem. > How

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > -alsa-lib-0.5 (Posting this now since it's changing day by day and I'm getting the feeling that other people are working on very nearly the same problem. How did alsa-driver's urgency get bumped?) * alpha: freesci, gnophon

Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Subject: Re: Assignments III (2003/04/18) (As you can tell, I got sidetracked between starting that message and sending it. Oh well.) Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>

Assignments III (2003/04/18)

Tradiddlydum. Given the exciting currency of inter-dependency problems at the moment (with perl/postgresql/python, ocaml, and libvorbis getting discussed), this week's addition to the tasks will include one of those each (in most cases it's a package that's trying to be removed from testing). Som

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 08:18:50AM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > 80888 followup: work out what to do about this package > This is the dnrd security bug. I still don't know what to do about it. > I don't have time nor do I want to rewrite a piece of software I don't > use. The upstream m

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

* Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-21 08:18]: > > 119851 followup: NMU needed; should package be marked as orphaned? > > I did an NMU. It looks like someone is going to take over gap4. Should > I still orphan it? I orphaned it a few days ago. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

> Neil Schemenauer > 56472 followup: has patch been accepted? is NMU useful? The maintainer applied my patch, uploaded and closed the bug. > 80888 followup: work out what to do about this package This is the dnrd security bug. I still don't know what to do about it. I don't have time

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 03:06:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:23:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > 150411 [P ] xshipwars-server: POSIX shell incompatibilities > > I sponsor the maintainer; I've prodded him. Currently the upload of > xshipwars is pending the

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:59:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > astrolog > Non-free package that needed rebuilt for other archs. New bug filed > about the issue, no response yet from maintainer. I recommend removal > from testing if still no response after another week. On Fri, Apr 11, 2003

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 07:24:28PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > New bug filed about the arch-specific build failure. No response yet > > from maintainer. Will NMU with an explicit gcc 2.95 build dep if no > > response this week. > Be careful if you do this, gcc-2.95 was never used on ia64 and

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:46:44AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-14 11:59]: > > > 92810 [ ] doc-rfc: license is not DFSG-free > > > 144841 [ ] doesn't build on arm > > No meaningful progress to report on the above two. > What about the

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Langasek) writes: >> hamfax > > New bug filed about the arch-specific build failure. No response yet > from maintainer. Will NMU with an explicit gcc 2.95 build dep if no > response this week. Be careful if you do this, gcc-2.95 was never used on ia64 and hppa so you'll

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-14 11:59]: > > 92810 [ ] doc-rfc: license is not DFSG-free > > 144841 [ ] doesn't build on arm > No meaningful progress to report on the above two. What about the new doc-rfc packages done by Martin Quinson which he told you about a while

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:23:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > 133563 [ + ] FTBFS: Build failure of doc-rfc on i386 This NMU has hit the archive. No screaming yet. > 143547 [ H] perl segfaults during configure stage Already fixed in the archive, per my comments last week. > 184302

Re: Assignments (II)

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 02:38:36PM -0400, James A. Morrison wrote: > trn, font3d, xgobi > > All non-free, maintainers notified, I think Colin is going to take care > of building trn on the needed architectures, Done now. 3.6-17 should go into testing tomorrow. Cheers, -- Colin Watson

Re: Assignments II (2003/04/03)

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:23:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Colin Watson >84493 followup: has fix introduced any new bugs? The NMU has built everywhere, is now in testing, and looks fine. > 104835 followup: has maintainer noticed the patch? Nope. I've uploaded an NMU. >

Assignments (II)

Hey, So to start with, all three packages that I was given that haven't entered testing are non-free. I've sent the maintainers the following email, poking them: -- Hi, If you would like ${PACKAGE} ${VERSION} to make it into testing and eventually stable it needs to be built and uploade

Re: Assignments

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:12:33PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > It used to exist, but was purged by aj due to being too broken. > http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt says: In particular, auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/web/removals.txt and klecker:/home/troup/public_html/removals.txt are good pla

Re: Assignments

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:04:20PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > Il mar, 2003-03-25 alle 05:01, Anthony Towns ha scritto: > > 123306 [ ] ginaccint doesn't build from source > > this is very strange, the Build-depends field for ginaccint says: > > cint (>=5.15.09) > > but a

Re: Assignments

sorry for being that late... Il mar, 2003-03-25 alle 05:01, Anthony Towns ha scritto: > Federico Di Gregorio >56713 [ ] dip: No cleanup after exit, duplicate route and ... i have not worked on this one. :( > 105052 [ ] Build failure on hppa (at least) this has been fi

Re: Assignments

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:01:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Steve Langasek >92810 [ ] doc-rfc: license is not DFSG-free > 133563 [ + ] FTBFS: Build failure of doc-rfc on i386 > 143547 [ H] perl segfaults during configure stage > 144841 [ ] does

Assignments II (2003/04/03)

[Not cc'ed to "herrn" release assistants] So, continuing on. Your second assignments, should you choose to accept them, come in three parts: followup of last week's bugs, a new set of bugs to solve, and finding and filing some unreported bugs. Followup basically means

Re: Assignments

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:46:57PM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote: > > James A Morrison > > 46709 [ S ] Mach lets processes write to I/O ports > This is not easily fixable in GNU Mach 1.0, but is fixed in GNU Mach > 2.0 which is not released. "Fixed in new upstream version" is fine, as lo

Re: Assignments

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:55:17AM -0800, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > 80888 [ H SU] Multiple buffer overflows in dnrd > I'm not going to fix this bug. The program uses a very dangerous style > of programming, IMHO. While I couldn't find any obvious security holes > after looking over the s

Re: Assignments

Anthony Towns wrote: >56472 [ ] zinf: Segfaults in Huffman code on PowerPC A patch has been uploaded. I think I will do a NMU since the maintainer has not responded. >80888 [ H SU] Multiple buffer overflows in dnrd I'm not going to fix this bug. The program uses a very

Re: Assignments

On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 23:01, Anthony Towns wrote: > [Cc'ed to herr release assistants] > > Hi guys, > > Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the > following bugs: > > James A Morrison >46709 [ S ] Mach lets processes write to I/O ports This is not easi

Re: Assignments

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:01:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > [Cc'ed to herr release assistants] The German dative plural is Herrn, IIRC from six-year-old grammar lessons. :-) > Colin Watson >84493 [ + ] failed to build from source There had already been activity on this bug talki

Assignments

[Cc'ed to herr release assistants] Hi guys, Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the following bugs: Neil Schemenauer 56472 [ ] zinf: Segfaults in Huffman code on PowerPC 80888 [ H SU] Multiple buffer overflows in dnrd 119851 [