reopen 385793
thanks
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > reopen 385793
> > > severity 385793 important
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do
> > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability.
>
> Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more impor
> yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do
> the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability.
Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important
problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day.
Plus, there are much less
reopen 385793
severity 385793 important
thanks
> Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java
> build in this release makes them unnecessary.
sorry, no. what you do here is to avoid the uninstallability for one
case (which however still exists), but the original problem
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > reopen 385793
> > severity 385793 important
> > thanks
> >
> > > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work d
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reopen 385793
> severity 385793 important
> thanks
>
> > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java
> > build in this release makes them unnecessary.
>
> sorry, no. what you do here
6 matches
Mail list logo
