n functions, such as fax support, will be reset to being
+ disabled every time a new firmware is installed
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:14:08 +0200
+
roger-router (1.8.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
* copyright: add copyright information for win32/printer/ghostpdf.ppd
diff
se changes should have little risk of regression and improve the
user experience for stable customers considerably.
Looking forward to your comments.
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
>From 67bc92d83524ebce8c3c0253d19e509c2556e2ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 2
On 12.03.2015 02:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> If the change truly drops a symbol in a public shared library, then I am
> afraid it is far far too late to accept this change. It implies doing
> an ABI transition, which we stopped accepting back in October 2014.
Niels,
thank you for t
ke before jessie
gets released.
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
unblock roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
>From a59161f6e088cf254438946433f7ef373fded9ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:59:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. Closes: #7741
under Python 3 (Closes: #760341). pastebinit
+will now default again to using paste.debian.net on Debian
+(Closes: #778336).
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:35:07 +0800
+
pastebinit (1.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
* bump debhelper to version 9
diff --git a/debian/patches
On 08.11.2014 20:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
>
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:10:09PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Patch 3 is addressing what is discussed in #71621, that
>> "update-alternative --remove" should not be call
On 08.11.2014 17:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:21:14PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have
>> them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me kno
exception for all or at least some of them. The scim package in
unstable is currently the same as in testing. Patch 3 is the one I amm
most keen on pushing into jessie. I have yet to upload after getting
clearance or rejection for a freeze exception for these patches
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
most keen on pushing into jessie.
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
>From 7076075e6cdccd43c345269e44a14f2163718f6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tz-Huan Huang
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:20:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] control: multi-archify the scim-im-agent package
---
debian/control | 1 +
1 file chan
On 25.04.2014 01:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 23:51:34 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: rm
>
libcapi20-3 package from migrating.
Best regards
Rolf Leggewie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTWTKiAAoJEJSEK8huURwxhuAP/RB3XNJc2DOcp6/EtE6nZSAC
nD8sQG9iRxGZ8W+ZDWmrmEbP8CB7IN3lb7DpADkDlShbu0Bb25ERQ9Pk9Mym1gEJ
GpKdbm7hOmItg06prLtul1UcSJOkeP5TK+2/u4GNw1hdeD3mR7bc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package isdnutils version 1:3.25+dfsg1-3
This is a translation-only update so I hope it should be fine
unblock isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 20.09.2012 14:52, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> The reason is scim-anthy was unblocked (Bug#685036) and migrated to
> testing but scim (1.4.14-2) still stops in unstable. So, release
> managers, can you consider to unblock scim to fix RC as well?
Yamane-San,
thank you for your report. Hello from To
On 26.08.2012 16:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> the size of that diff is the main issue with unblocking it currently,
> as it's very difficult to review.
Adam, please do not hesitate to contact me or Tz-Huan if we can somehow
make the review any easier or more efficient for the release team.
--
T
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package scim-anthy version 1.2.7-5
It has been reported to us that the configuration setup
for scim-anthy crashes for some users (bug 682601 and
680988). This is du
Niels,
thank you for having a look at this request.
On 15.08.2012 16:14, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2012-07-31 08:53, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Please unblock package ffgtk 0.8.1-2 which fixes an FTBFS induced by
>> changes in libcapi20-dev upst
er
to allow isdnutils 1:3.25+dfsg-2 into wheezy.
Thank you.
Regards
Rolf
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0dfe4cb..519fab6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+isdnutils (1:3.25+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Rolf Leg
Dear listmaster and release team,
I would like to bring to your attention that apparently some mail to
debian-release@ is being dropped somewhere. Some of the unblock
requests for my packages arrived fine in the BTS but it looks like they
never made it to the mailing list of the release team. I
.14-1x1 to unstable
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:04:35 +0800
+
+scim (1.4.14-1x1) experimental; urgency=low
+
+ * scim-clutter-immodule: install files from multi-arch paths.
+Closes: #679724
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:35:06 +0800
+
scim (1.4.14-1) unstable; u
* add patch to compile ffgtk against libcapi v3.25. Closes: #680813
+ * unbreak the watch file, upstream disallows direct directory access now
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:57:12 +0800
+
ffgtk (0.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* initial release. Closes: #602723, LP: #522644.
diff --
Hello,
I've had a fair bit of trouble to get the VERY brittle net connection
here to successfully complete the upload of the sizeable isdnutils
package. I believe it's complete now but it took me a while.
I did not provide a debdiff here, I am not sure it makes much sense.
You've already seen t
Mehdi,
thank you for the quick reply.
On 06.07.2012 21:32, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 06/07/12 15:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> I'm requesting a freeze exception for 3.25+dfsg1-1 of isdnutils
> Did you upload it?
Not yet. I wanted to hear first if it's going to be "slimm
the correct context. When I
dropped it I had considered it as part of the dropped code.
Please let me know if you have any objections to shipping
the patch alongside the dfsg-fix.
Regards
Rolf
>From 1bdd1ae0c2a8c210d0b1bbc5834109eb816f48a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie
Date: Fr
Hi,
On 04.06.2012 05:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Rolf Leggewie (03/06/2012):
>> Please grant a freeze exception or better yet, sponsor it ;-)
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/602723 (ITP)
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffgtk/ffgtk_0.8.1-1.dsc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ffgtk
I've been trying for a while to find a sponsor for ffgtk.
The mentor who said they would do it informed me yesterday
that it likely won't happen in tim
On 17.01.2012 02:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005
>
> Okay. Even if this turns out to be another bug it would need to be
> resolved in unstable first
Of course.
> I've accepted the package you uploaded.
Many thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
On 15.01.2012 23:28, Maximilian Gerhard wrote:
>> Adding configs to ~/.pastebin.d overrides everything, because of the
>> "pastebind" configuration list reset. But that's the way it is upstream.
I've opened a ticket upstream to see if this is really intentional.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release.
I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since
a member of the release team needs to either ACK or reject this anyhow I
thought we might as well do it on the re
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd like to see a debdiff for a final ack, but from the description
> provided this sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point
> release.
Adam, thank you for your reply. Not quite a debdiff but I suppose
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~past
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Severity: important
thank you
Max,
thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit
r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that
as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the
Stable
Severity: normal
thank you
Max,
thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit r81 to
version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that as I believe
your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the Stable Release Team first
what they think. They will
I'm not in a mood for this kind of "discussion". I can only reiterate
that there is nothing I can do. Packages built after openssl 1.0.0 had
become the standard are fine and I have no control over older binary
packages that are already released.
>> I can only repeat that there is nothing inherent
Adam,
thank you for your comment.
FWIW, http://packages.debian.org/sid/ipppd lists libssl0.9.8 for alpha,
armhf, hppa, m68k, sh4 and libssl1.0.0 for the rest. I checked the
other binary packages as well.
I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force
dependency on libs
On 07.10.2011 02:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
openssl098 is still kept in testing by:
[...]
- isdnutils (#618228, has reverse dependencies)
Julien,
thank you for the heads up. I maintain (to the best of my limited
abilities) the isdnutils package in D
Mehdi,
thank you for your mail.
If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion
then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no
further replies to my last message and certainly nothing that would made
me reconsider my position. If anything I should b
Hi,
On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get this
> finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU?
My package has been up at mentors.debian.net for sponsorship for almost
a week now. I sincerely hope that anybody actually consideri
Luk Claes wrote:
unblocked
Thanks a lot for your work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I have prepared a minimal patch to fix bug 499410 in pastebinit and
uploaded the 0.10-2 release to mentors.debian.net so that it can be
included in the upcoming stable release of debian.
Pastebinit upstream has released version 0.11 yesterday. But before I
push that into unstable, I'd l
Hi there,
I have been trying to get gourmet into debian for some time now. It
seems that unfortunately, I missed the "lenny window". Or more
precisely, my package was lingering in the upload queue before anybody
had a chance to look at it while the window closed.
I was wondering if it is p
39 matches
Mail list logo
