Re: Debian Naming Suggestion

is and passing it along for consideration. Jeremy -- Andrew Donnellan http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG - hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58 --- Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au Debian user - http://

Re: .jigdo files for unstable/sid

Can't seem to find any mirrors: I have found heaps of jigdo files from < sarge, but none for current sid. It seems fsn://HU is not creating files for some reason. All the mirrors have out of date images (some from March, some from March 2001...). Is anyone willing to create a new mirror with curren

Re: Huzzah for the Release Team!

If I ever meet the release team, there'll be $NON_ALCOHOLIC_BEVERAGE_OF_CHOICE available! Andrew On 5/25/05, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just looking at the flood of "please consider for testing" messages on > this list, all of which need to be read, checked over, and a (possibly

Re: elinks rc bug

w On 5/22/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > The latest sarge elinks still has the code > > Which is exactly what I have said... > > > On 5/21/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: elinks rc bug

The latest sarge elinks still has the code Andrew On 5/21/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:13:01PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > I have just submitted a serious bug against the elinks package. > > (310035) It is to do with t

elinks rc bug

ebian team response to get the code relicensed. The other option is to remove elinks from sarge. I have emailed Joey about prozilla still being in woody. Andrew Donnellan -- Heritage Linux Group http://www.heritagelinux.tk

Re: please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for sarge

I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug. Andrew Donnellan On 5/21/05, Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of

Re: Release Notes - non-us being phased out - please comment

How many sarge packages are still in non-us? These are mainly crypto and patented packages, arent't they? We should try to get as many into main as possible. Andrew Donnellan On 5/19/05, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Prompted by Jeroen van Wolffelaar I propose to include

Archiving upgrade reports?

Should we archive/close old/fixed upgrade and install reports or not? There are reports over a year old and some that refer to closed bugs. There are quite a few to close and archive. Andrew Donnellan volunteer report processor -- Heritage Linux Group http://www.heritagelinux.tk

Processing upgrade reports

Hi, I'll volunteer to process upgrade reports for sarge. I'm not a DD, though. Andrew Donnellan