It is a *serious policy violation*. I've been talking with the ftpparse lists and it turns out that there is a replacement in the program ftpcopy (search google). I haven't verified it though. Here's my analysis of the problems: * Commercial use requires contacting author (no specific DFSG violation, but still makes it nonfree in my opinion) * Doesn't give explicit permission to modify or redistribute (serious violation of DFSGs #1 and 3) * prozilla uses an unmodified version, elinks uses a modified version. * This is still a release blocker in my opinion
Andrew On 5/22/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > The latest sarge elinks still has the code > > Which is exactly what I have said... > > > On 5/21/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Shouldn't this have been fixed by 0.10.4-1? This would leave the issue > > > open for sarge still but probably one could backport that change... > > Gruesse, > -- > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > www: http://www.djpig.de/ > -- Heritage Linux Group http://www.heritagelinux.tk
